Vuksanovic Dean, Green Heather J, Dyck Murray, Morrissey Shirley A
Menzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Menzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Feb;53(2):162-170.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
Dignity therapy (DT) is a psychotherapeutic intervention with increasing evidence of acceptability and utility in palliative care settings.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the legacy creation component of DT by comparing this intervention with life review (LR) and waitlist control (WC) groups.
Seventy adults with advanced terminal disease were randomly allocated to DT, LR, or WC followed by DT, of which 56 completed the study protocol. LR followed an identical protocol to DT except that no legacy document was created in LR. Primary outcome measures were the Brief Generativity and Ego-Integrity Questionnaire, Patient Dignity Inventory, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, version 4, and treatment evaluation questionnaires.
Unlike LR and WC groups, DT recipients demonstrated significantly increased generativity and ego-integrity scores at study completion. There were no significant changes for dignity-related distress or physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being among the three groups. There were also no significant changes in primary outcomes after the provision of DT after the waiting period in the WC group. High acceptability and satisfaction with interventions were noted for recipients of both DT and LR and family/carers of DT participants.
This study provides initial evidence that the specific process of legacy creation is able to positively affect sense of generativity, meaning, and acceptance near end of life. High acceptability and satisfaction rates for both DT and LR and positive impacts on families/carers of DT participants provide additional support for clinical utility of these interventions. Further evaluation of specific mechanisms of change post-intervention is required given DT's uncertain efficacy on other primary outcomes.
尊严疗法(DT)是一种心理治疗干预方法,在姑息治疗环境中的可接受性和实用性证据日益增多。
本研究旨在通过将该干预与生命回顾(LR)和等待名单对照(WC)组进行比较,评估尊严疗法的遗产创造部分。
70名晚期绝症成年人被随机分配到尊严疗法组、生命回顾组或等待名单对照组,然后再接受尊严疗法,其中56人完成了研究方案。生命回顾组遵循与尊严疗法组相同的方案,只是生命回顾组没有创建遗产文件。主要结局指标包括《简短繁衍力与自我完整性问卷》、《患者尊严量表》、《癌症治疗功能评估通用版》第4版以及治疗评估问卷。
与生命回顾组和等待名单对照组不同,接受尊严疗法的患者在研究结束时繁衍力和自我完整性得分显著提高。三组在尊严相关困扰或身体、社会、情感和功能健康方面均无显著变化。等待名单对照组在等待期后接受尊严疗法后,主要结局也无显著变化。尊严疗法和生命回顾疗法的接受者以及尊严疗法参与者的家属/照顾者对干预措施的接受度和满意度都很高。
本研究提供了初步证据,表明遗产创造的具体过程能够在生命末期对繁衍感、意义感和接纳感产生积极影响。尊严疗法和生命回顾疗法的高接受度和满意度,以及对尊严疗法参与者家属/照顾者的积极影响,为这些干预措施的临床实用性提供了额外支持。鉴于尊严疗法对其他主要结局的疗效尚不确定,需要进一步评估干预后具体的变化机制。