Krzeminski Patryk, Corchete Luis A, García Juan L, López-Corral Lucía, Fermiñán Encarna, García Eva M, Martín Ana A, Hernández-Rivas Jesús M, García-Sanz Ramón, San Miguel Jesús F, Gutiérrez Norma C
Departamento de Hematología, Hospital Universitario, IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.
Centro de Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.
Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 6;7(49):80664-80679. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13025.
Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable despite the introduction of novel agents, and a relapsing course is observed in most patients. Although the development of genomic technologies has greatly improved our understanding of MM pathogenesis, the mechanisms underlying relapse have been less thoroughly investigated. In this study, an integrative analysis of DNA copy number, DNA methylation and gene expression was conducted in matched diagnosis and relapse samples from MM patients. Overall, the acquisition of abnormalities at relapse was much more frequent than the loss of lesions present at diagnosis, and DNA losses were significantly more frequent in relapse than in diagnosis samples. Interestingly, copy number abnormalities involving more than 100 Mb of DNA at relapse significantly affect the gene expression of these samples, provoking a particular deregulation of the IL-8 pathway. On the other hand, no significant modifications of gene expression were observed in those samples with less than 100 Mb affected by chromosomal changes. Although several statistical approaches were used to identify genes whose abnormal expression at relapse was regulated by methylation, only two genes that were significantly deregulated in relapse samples (SORL1 and GLT1D1) showed a negative correlation between methylation and expression. Further analysis revealed that DNA methylation was involved in regulating SORL1 expression in MM. Finally, relevant changes in gene expression observed in relapse samples, such us downregulation of CD27 and P2RY8, were most likely not preceded by alterations in the corresponding DNA. Taken together, these results suggest that the genomic heterogeneity described at diagnosis remains at relapse.
尽管引入了新型药物,多发性骨髓瘤(MM)仍然无法治愈,并且大多数患者会出现复发过程。虽然基因组技术的发展极大地增进了我们对MM发病机制的理解,但复发的潜在机制尚未得到充分研究。在本研究中,对MM患者配对的诊断和复发样本进行了DNA拷贝数、DNA甲基化和基因表达的综合分析。总体而言,复发时异常的获得比诊断时存在的病变丢失更为频繁,并且复发时DNA丢失比诊断样本中显著更频繁。有趣的是,复发时涉及超过100 Mb DNA的拷贝数异常显著影响这些样本的基因表达,引发了IL-8途径的特定失调。另一方面,在受染色体变化影响小于100 Mb的样本中未观察到基因表达的显著改变。尽管使用了几种统计方法来鉴定复发时异常表达受甲基化调节的基因,但只有两个在复发样本中显著失调的基因(SORL1和GLT1D1)显示甲基化与表达之间呈负相关。进一步分析表明,DNA甲基化参与调节MM中SORL1的表达。最后,在复发样本中观察到的基因表达的相关变化,如CD27和P2RY8的下调,很可能在相应DNA改变之前并未发生。综上所述,这些结果表明诊断时描述的基因组异质性在复发时仍然存在。