Phero James A, Nelson Blake, Davis Bobby, Dunlop Natalie, Phillips Ceib, Reside Glenn, Tikunov Andrew P, White Raymond P
Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Former Dental Student, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;75(4):688-693. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.055. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
Outcomes for peak blood levels were assessed for buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine compared with non-buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.
In this institutional review board-approved prospective, randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial, the clinical impact of buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (Anutra Medical, Research Triangle Park, Cary, NC) was compared with the non-buffered drug. Venous blood samples for lidocaine were obtained 30 minutes after a mandibular nerve block with 80 mg of the buffered or unbuffered drug. Two weeks later, the same subjects were tested with the alternate drug combinations. Subjects also reported on pain on injection with a 10-point Likert-type scale and time to lower lip numbness. The explanatory variable was the drug formulation. Outcome variables were subjects' peak blood lidocaine levels, subjective responses to pain on injection, and time to lower lip numbness. Serum lidocaine levels were analyzed with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Statistical analyses were performed using Proc TTEST (SAS 9.3; SAS Institute, Cary, NC), with the crossover option for a 2-period crossover design, to analyze the normally distributed outcome for pain. For non-normally distributed outcomes of blood lidocaine levels and time to lower lip numbness, an assessment of treatment difference was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with Proc NPAR1WAY (SAS 9.3). Statistical significance was set at a P value less than .05 for all outcomes.
Forty-eight percent of subjects were women, half were Caucasian, 22% were African American, and 13% were Asian. Median age was 21 years (interquartile range [IQR], 20-22 yr), and median body weight was 147 lb (IQR, 130-170 lb). Median blood levels (44 blood samples) at 30 minutes were 1.19 μg/L per kilogram of body weight. Mean blood level differences of lidocaine for each patient were significantly lower after nerve block with the buffered drug compared with the non-buffered agent (P < .01). Mean score for pain on injection for nerve block (n = 46 scores) was 3.3 (standard deviation, 0.9). Seventy-eight percent of subjects reported lower or the same pain scores with the buffered drug; 61% of subjects reported a shorter time to lower lip numbness with the buffered drug.
Buffering 2% lidocaine with epinephrine can produce clinical outcomes favorable for subjects and clinicians without clinically detrimental peak blood lidocaine levels.
评估含1:100,000肾上腺素的缓冲2%利多卡因与不含缓冲剂的含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因的血药峰值水平。
在这项经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性、随机、双盲、交叉试验中,比较了含1:100,000肾上腺素的缓冲2%利多卡因(Anutra Medical公司,北卡罗来纳州卡里市三角研究园)与不含缓冲剂的药物的临床影响。在下颌神经阻滞使用80mg缓冲或未缓冲药物30分钟后采集利多卡因静脉血样。两周后,同一受试者使用另一种药物组合进行测试。受试者还使用10分李克特量表报告注射时的疼痛情况以及下唇麻木的时间。解释变量为药物剂型。结果变量为受试者的利多卡因血药峰值水平、对注射疼痛的主观反应以及下唇麻木的时间。血清利多卡因水平采用液相色谱 - 质谱法进行分析。使用Proc TTEST(SAS 9.3;SAS Institute公司,北卡罗来纳州卡里市)进行统计分析,并采用两期交叉设计的交叉选项来分析疼痛这一正态分布的结果。对于利多卡因血药水平和下唇麻木时间这些非正态分布的结果,使用Proc NPAR1WAY(SAS 9.3)中的Wilcoxon秩和检验来评估治疗差异。所有结果的统计学显著性设定为P值小于0.05。
48%的受试者为女性,一半为白种人,22%为非裔美国人,13%为亚洲人。中位年龄为21岁(四分位间距[IQR],20 - 22岁),中位体重为147磅(IQR,130 - 170磅)。30分钟时的中位血药水平(44份血样)为每千克体重1.19μg/L。与未缓冲药物相比,使用缓冲药物进行神经阻滞后,每位患者利多卡因的平均血药水平差异显著更低(P < 0.01)。神经阻滞注射时的疼痛平均评分(n = 46次评分)为3.3(标准差,0.9)。78%的受试者报告使用缓冲药物时疼痛评分更低或相同;61%的受试者报告使用缓冲药物时下唇麻木时间更短。
用肾上腺素缓冲2%利多卡因可产生对受试者和临床医生有利的临床结果,且不会出现对临床有不利影响的利多卡因血药峰值水平。