Jackson Jennie, Currie Kay, Graham Cheryl, Robb Yvonne
1. Jennie Jackson RD, RNutr, PgDip Dietet, PhD, BSc (Hons) Scottish Centre for Evidence Based Care of Older People, Glasgow, Scotland: a Collaborating Centre of the Joanna Briggs Institute 2. Kay Currie PhD, Reader, School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University 3. Cheryl Graham BSc (Hons), MRSS, MPhil, PgCLTHE, Associate Fellow of the Higher Education Academy. Graduate Teaching Assistant/ PhD Student. School of Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University 4. Yvonne Robb PhD, MSc, BSc(Hons), DipNEd, RNT, RGN Lecturer/Research Associate School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University.
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(37):1509-1550. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201109370-00001.
Background Older adults with dementia may have feeding difficulties for several reasons: they may experience deterioration in motor and cognitive skills making eating difficult, they may forget to eat, fail to recognise food or they may suffer from dysphagia. Food intake is often poor and malnutrition is common, leading to adverse health outcomes.This review specifically focussed on how best to promote and achieve 'normal' eating and feeding in older adults with dementia, in order that undernutrition and its consequences could be avoided.Review Objectives The aim was to identify and assess the effectiveness of interventions that encouraged eating and minimised risk of undernutrition in older adults with dementia.Types of Participants Adults over the age of sixty with dementia in any care setting (who were not living independently). People receiving enteral tube feeding were excluded.Types of Interventions Any intervention that promoted dietary intake e.g. changes in practice of health care workers, family or volunteers, educational interventions, changes in food service.Types of Outcomes The primary outcomes were improvement in dietary intake and/or nutritional status. Measurements included: dietary intake, anthropometry, clinical outcomes, functional indicators.Types of Studies Randomised controlled trials, controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies with a 'before and after' design.Search Strategy The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies using a three-step approach. Papers were limited to the English language and a date restriction of 1999 to 2009 was set.Critical appraisal Papers selected for retrieval were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review. Disagreements that arose between the reviewers were resolved through discussion.Data Extraction For quantitative studies, data was extracted using a data extraction form developed to include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives. This was based on the JBI data extraction tool from MAStARI and 2 reviewers extracted data independently.Data synthesis Heterogeneity in study designs, interventions and outcomes meant meta-analysis was not possible. Findings were discussed in a narrative summary.Results The review included 11 studies. This included one RCT, 1 randomised crossover study, 3 controlled non-randomised trials, 6 quasi-experimental studies. None of the studies provided robust evidence, however there was moderate evidence (Level 3) to support a Grade B recommendation for improvements in dietary intake and/or nutritional status with the following interventions: education of healthcare staff, simple environmental manipulations such as the use of high contrast tableware or small dining rooms, the introduction of something of interest such as an aquarium or background music, or the provision of feeding assistance, provision of enhanced menus, use of a decentralised food service, enhanced nutritional screening combined with increased dietetic time.Conclusion There is moderate (Level 3) evidence to support each of the interventions appraised in this review.Implications for Practice There is moderate support that warrants consideration of the interventions listed above. Careful monitoring of weight of individual residents would help to determine the effectiveness of any such change in delivery of care.Implications for Research Future research into interventions to improve eating and minimise undernutrition in older people with dementia should feature the following: inclusion of reliable outcome measures, full details of interventions, randomisation of participants, inclusion of control groups, adequate sample sizes, longitudinal follow up, consideration of baseline demographics of intervention groups, and experimental design that allows the determination of the effectiveness of individual definable changes in delivery of care.
患有痴呆症的老年人可能因多种原因出现进食困难:他们可能运动和认知技能退化,导致进食困难,可能忘记进食、无法识别食物,或者可能患有吞咽困难。食物摄入量往往很低,营养不良很常见,会导致不良健康后果。本综述专门关注如何最好地促进和实现患有痴呆症的老年人“正常”进食,以避免营养不良及其后果。
目的是识别和评估鼓励患有痴呆症的老年人进食并将营养不良风险降至最低的干预措施的有效性。
任何护理环境中(非独立生活)60岁以上患有痴呆症的成年人。接受肠内管饲的人被排除在外。
任何促进饮食摄入的干预措施,例如医护人员、家人或志愿者行为的改变、教育干预、食品服务的改变。
主要结果是饮食摄入量和/或营养状况的改善。测量包括:饮食摄入量、人体测量、临床结果、功能指标。
随机对照试验、对照试验以及采用“前后”设计的准实验研究。
搜索策略旨在通过三步法找到已发表和未发表的研究。论文限于英文,并设定了1999年至2009年的日期限制。
在纳入综述之前,由两名独立评审员对选定检索的论文进行方法学有效性评估。评审员之间出现的分歧通过讨论解决。
对于定量研究,使用为纳入与综述问题和具体目标相关的干预措施、人群、研究方法和结果的具体细节而开发的数据提取表提取数据。这基于MAStARI的JBI数据提取工具,两名评审员独立提取数据。
研究设计、干预措施和结果的异质性意味着无法进行荟萃分析。研究结果在叙述性总结中进行讨论。
该综述包括11项研究。其中包括1项随机对照试验、1项随机交叉研究、3项对照非随机试验、6项准实验研究。然而,没有一项研究提供有力证据,不过有中等证据(3级)支持B级推荐,即通过以下干预措施改善饮食摄入量和/或营养状况:医护人员教育、简单环境操纵(如使用高对比度餐具或小餐厅)、引入有趣事物(如水族箱或背景音乐)或者提供喂食协助、提供强化菜单、采用分散式食品服务、强化营养筛查并增加营养师服务时间。
有中等(3级)证据支持本综述中评估的每项干预措施。
有中等支持力度,值得考虑上述干预措施。仔细监测个体居民的体重将有助于确定护理提供方面任何此类变化的有效性。
未来针对改善患有痴呆症的老年人进食并将营养不良降至最低的干预措施的研究应具备以下特点:纳入可靠的结果测量、干预措施的完整细节、参与者随机分组、纳入对照组、足够的样本量、纵向随访、考虑干预组的基线人口统计学特征以及允许确定护理提供中个体可定义变化有效性的实验设计。