Iankowitz Nancy, Dowden Margaret, Palomino Sara, Uzokwe Helen, Worral Priscilla
1.Pace University, New York, NY 2.Pace University, New York, NY; The New Jersey Centre for Evidence Based Nursing: A Collaborating Centre of the Joanna Briggs Institute at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey; Coordinator of Nursing Research Upstate Medical University Health System, Syracuse NY.
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(13):798-831. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-68.
Prescribing potentially inappropriate medications to the elderly leads to adverse health outcomes. The use of computer systems decision making tools has been shown to decrease the incidence of prescribing potentially inappropriate medications for the elderly; however, these results are often dependent upon other variables, such as provider compliance.
To examine and synthesize the best available evidence related to the effect of computer systems clinical decision making tools on frequency of ordering potentially inappropriate medications at discharge and related unplanned emergency room visits or hospital readmissions in community dwelling patients older than 65 years of age.
Adults older than 65 years of age prescribed potentially inappropriate medications.Types of interventions Electronic or computer based clinical decision making supplement or support related to prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications.The outcome measures were frequency of ordering potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for patients at discharge, unexpected hospital readmission rate and unexpected emergency room visits of patients who were discharged on PIMs.Randomised control trials and quasi-experimental studies.
The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies in the English language from January 2003 through July 2011. A search of PubMED, CINAHL, Health Source Nursing/Academic Edition, MasterFILE Premier, Scopus, DARE, Academic Search Premier, Scirus, Embase was conducted.
Studies were critically evaluated by two independent reviewers using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute.
Data were extracted using the standardised data extraction instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute.
Results from quantitative papers were pooled in statistical meta-analysis as appropriate using JBI-MAStARI. Where statistical pooling was not possible, the findings are presented in narrative form.
A total of five articles, four randomised control studies and one quasi-experimental study were included. One study demonstrated that a computerised alert tool along with collaboration of the health care providers resulted in a statistically significant (p=0.002) decrease in ordering of PIMs as well as improved medication safety in patients older than 65 years of age. Similarly, a randomised controlled study demonstrated that computerised physician order entry with decision support significantly (p=0.02) reduced prescribing of PIMs for seniors (odds ratio=0.55, 95% CI=0.34 - 0.89). Another study demonstrated that computer-based access to complete drug profiles and alerts reduced the rate of initiation of potentially inappropriate prescriptions by 18% (RR=0.82, 95% CI=0.69-0.98). Yet another study demonstrated that implementation of age specific alerts decreases prescription writing of PIMs from 21.9 prescriptions to 16.8 per 10,000 patients; p value < 0.01. One study demonstrated that age specific alerts reduced prescribing of PIMs from 150.2 to 137.2 prescriptions per 10,000 patients; the p value = 0.75 was not statistically significant. Results from two trials were pooled for meta-analysis, with summary RR = 0.82, and 95%CI (0.76 - 0.88). No studies were found that specifically addressed unexpected hospital readmission or unexpected visits to the emergency room of patients who were discharged on PIMs.
Reduction in prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications occurs when clinical decision making computer support tools, such as drug specific alerts, are available to providers.Computer systems clinical decision making tools have potential for reducing numbers of potentially inappropriate medications prescribed for the community based population older than 65 years of age.Future research should continue to explore the effects of computerized clinical decision making tools on prescription writing habits of practitioners for the elderly population. In addition, documentation of unplanned ER visits and unplanned readmission rates needs to be correlated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications.
给老年人开具潜在不适当药物会导致不良健康后果。已证明使用计算机系统决策工具可降低给老年人开具潜在不适当药物的发生率;然而,这些结果往往取决于其他变量,如医疗服务提供者的依从性。
审查并综合现有最佳证据,以探讨计算机系统临床决策工具对65岁以上社区居住患者出院时开具潜在不适当药物的频率以及相关非计划急诊就诊或住院再入院的影响。
65岁以上开具潜在不适当药物的成年人。干预类型:与开具潜在不适当药物相关的电子或基于计算机的临床决策补充或支持。结局指标为患者出院时开具潜在不适当药物(PIMs)的频率、因PIMs出院患者的意外住院再入院率和意外急诊就诊率。随机对照试验和准实验研究。
检索策略旨在查找2003年1月至2011年7月期间以英文发表和未发表的研究。对PubMed、CINAHL、健康源护理/学术版、MasterFILE Premier、Scopus、DARE、学术搜索高级版、Scirus、Embase进行了检索。
由两名独立评审员使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的标准化批判性评价工具对研究进行严格评估。
使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的标准化数据提取工具提取数据。
定量论文的结果在适当情况下使用JBI-MAStARI进行统计荟萃分析合并。在无法进行统计合并的情况下,研究结果以叙述形式呈现。
共纳入5篇文章,4篇随机对照研究和1篇准实验研究。一项研究表明,计算机化警报工具与医疗服务提供者的协作导致65岁以上患者开具PIMs的数量在统计学上显著减少(p=0.002),同时药物安全性得到改善。同样一项随机对照研究表明,带有决策支持的计算机化医师医嘱录入显著(p=0.02)减少了老年人PIMs的开具(优势比=0.55,95%可信区间=0.34 - 0.89)。另一项研究表明,基于计算机获取完整药物档案和警报可使潜在不适当处方的起始率降低18%(相对危险度=0.82,95%可信区间=0.69 - 0.98)。还有一项研究表明,实施特定年龄警报可使每10000名患者的PIMs处方量从21.9张降至16.8张;p值<0.01。一项研究表明,特定年龄警报使每10000名患者的PIMs处方量从150.2张降至137.2张;p值=0.75,无统计学意义。两项试验的结果进行了荟萃分析合并,汇总相对危险度=0.82,95%可信区间(0.76 - 0.88)。未发现专门针对因PIMs出院患者的意外住院再入院或意外急诊就诊的研究。
当为医疗服务提供者提供药物特定警报等临床决策计算机支持工具时,潜在不适当药物的开具会减少。计算机系统临床决策工具有可能减少为65岁以上社区人群开具的潜在不适当药物数量。未来研究应继续探索计算机化临床决策工具对老年人群执业者处方习惯的影响。此外,非计划急诊就诊和非计划再入院率的记录需要与潜在不适当药物的使用相关联。