Phillips Nicole M, Nay Rhonda
1 Division of Nursing and Midwifery and 2 Gerontic Nursing Clinical School, Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victonia, Australia.
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2007;5(6):344-406. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200705060-00001.
Enteral tubes are frequently inserted as part of medical treatment in a wide range of patient situations. Patients with an enteral tube are cared for by nurses in a variety of settings, including general and specialised acute care areas, aged care facilities and at home. Regardless of the setting, nurses have the primary responsibility for administering medication through enteral tubes. Medication administration via an enteral tube is a reasonably common nursing intervention that entails a number of skills, including preparing the medication, verifying the tube position, flushing the tube and assessing for potential complications. If medications are not given effectively through an enteral tube, harmful consequences may result leading to increased morbidity, for example, tube occlusion, diarrhoea and aspiration pneumonia. There are resultant costs for the health-care system related to possible increased length of stay and increased use of equipment. Presently what is considered to be best practice to give medications through enteral tubes is unknown.
The objective of this systematic review was to determine the best available evidence on which nursing interventions are effective in minimising the complications associated with the administration of medications via enteral tubes in adults. Nursing interventions and considerations related to medication administration included form of medication, verifying tube placement before administration, methods used to give medication, methods used to flush tubes, maintenance of tube patency and specific practices to prevent possible complications related to the administration of enteral medications.
The following databases were searched for literature reported in English only: CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Current Contents/All Editions, EMBASE, Australasian Medical Index and PsychINFO. There was no date restriction applied. In addition, the reference lists of all included studies were scrutinised for other potentially relevant studies.
Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and RCTs that compared the effectiveness of nursing interventions and considerations used in the administration of medications via enteral tubes. Other research methods, such as non-randomised controlled trials, longitudinal studies, cohort and case control studies, were also included. Exclusion criteria included studies investigating drug-nutrient interactions or the bioavailability of specific medications.
Initial consideration of potential relevance to the review was carried out by the primary author (NP). Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility for inclusion. A meta-analysis could not be undertaken, as there were no comparable RCTs identified. All data were presented in a narrative summary.
There is very limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of nursing interventions in minimising the complications associated with enteral tube medication administration in adults. The review highlights a lack of high quality research on many important nursing issues relating to enteral medication administration. There is huge scope for further research. Some of the evidence that was identified included that nurses should consider the use of liquid form medications as there may be fewer tube occlusions than with solid forms in nasoenteral tubes and silicone percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy tubes. Nurses may need to consider the sorbitol content of some liquid medications, for example, elixirs, as diarrhoea has been attributed to the sorbitol content of the elixir, not the drug itself. In addition, the use of 30 mL of water for irrigation when administering medications or flushing small-diameter nasoenteral tubes may reduce the number of tube occlusions.
肠内管常作为多种患者治疗的一部分被插入。有肠内管的患者在各种环境中由护士护理,包括普通和专科急症护理区、老年护理机构及家中。无论环境如何,护士对通过肠内管给药负有主要责任。通过肠内管给药是一种相当常见的护理干预,需要多种技能,包括准备药物、确认管位置、冲洗管道及评估潜在并发症。如果药物不能有效通过肠内管给药,可能会导致有害后果,如增加发病率,例如管道堵塞、腹泻和吸入性肺炎。这会给医疗系统带来与住院时间可能延长及设备使用增加相关的成本。目前,关于通过肠内管给药的最佳实践尚不明确。
本系统评价的目的是确定关于哪些护理干预措施能有效减少成人通过肠内管给药相关并发症的最佳现有证据。与给药相关的护理干预和注意事项包括药物剂型、给药前确认管位置、给药方法、冲洗管道方法、保持管道通畅以及预防肠内药物给药相关可能并发症的具体做法。
仅检索了以下以英文报道文献的数据库:护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、考克兰图书馆、现刊目次/所有版本、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、澳大利亚医学索引和心理学文摘数据库(PsychINFO)。未设日期限制。此外,对所有纳入研究的参考文献列表进行了审查,以查找其他可能相关的研究。
对随机对照试验(RCT)及比较通过肠内管给药时护理干预和注意事项有效性的RCT进行系统评价。其他研究方法,如非随机对照试验、纵向研究、队列研究和病例对照研究也包括在内。排除标准包括研究药物 - 营养相互作用或特定药物生物利用度的研究。
由第一作者(NP)初步考虑与评价潜在相关性。两名评价者独立评估研究纳入资格。由于未识别出可比较的RCT,无法进行荟萃分析。所有数据以叙述性总结形式呈现。
关于护理干预措施在减少成人肠内管给药相关并发症方面有效性的证据非常有限。该评价突出了在许多与肠内药物给药相关的重要护理问题上缺乏高质量研究。有很大的进一步研究空间。已确定的一些证据包括,护士应考虑使用液体制剂,因为与鼻肠管和硅胶经皮内镜胃造瘘管中的固体制剂相比,液体制剂可能导致管道堵塞的情况更少。护士可能需要考虑某些液体制剂(如酏剂)的山梨醇含量,因为腹泻被归因于酏剂中的山梨醇含量,而非药物本身。此外,给药或冲洗小口径鼻肠管时使用30 mL水进行冲洗可能会减少管道堵塞的次数。