Phillips Nicole M, Nay Rhonda
Division of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Sep;17(17):2257-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02407.x.
This systematic review aimed to determine the best available evidence regarding the effectiveness of nursing interventions in minimising the complications associated with administering medication via enteral tubes in adults.
Giving enteral medication is a fairly common nursing intervention entailing several skills: verifying tube position, preparing medication, flushing the tube and assessing for potential complications. If not carried out effectively harmful consequences may result leading to increased morbidity and even mortality. Until now, what was considered to be best practice in this area was unknown.
Systematic review.
CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Current Contents/All Editions, EMBASE, Australasian Medical Index and PsychINFO databases were searched up to September 2005. Reference lists of included studies were appraised. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility for inclusion. There were no comparable randomised-controlled trials; data were presented in a narrative summary.
Identified evidence included using 30 ml of water for irrigation when giving medication or flushing small-diameter nasoenteral tubes may reduce tube occlusion. Using liquid medication should be considered as there may be less tube occlusions than with solid forms in nasoenteral tubes and silicone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. In addition, nurses may need to consider the sorbitol content of some liquid medications, for example elixirs, as diarrhoea has been attributed to the sorbitol content of the elixir, not the drug itself.
The evidence was limited. There was a lack of high-quality research on many important issues relating to giving enteral medication.
Nurses have the primary responsibility for giving medication through enteral tubes and need knowledge of the best available evidence. Some of the nursing considerations and interventions relating to this skill have been researched in the clinical area and have implications for practice. There is a need for further studies to strengthen these findings.
本系统评价旨在确定关于护理干预在降低成人经肠内管给药相关并发症有效性方面的最佳现有证据。
经肠内给药是一项相当常见的护理干预措施,需要多种技能:确认管道位置、准备药物、冲洗管道以及评估潜在并发症。如果操作不当,可能会导致有害后果,增加发病率甚至死亡率。到目前为止,该领域被认为的最佳实践尚不清楚。
系统评价。
检索截至2005年9月的CINAHL、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、现刊目次/所有版本、EMBASE、澳大利亚医学索引和PsychINFO数据库。对纳入研究的参考文献列表进行评估。两名评价者独立评估研究纳入的合格性。没有可比较的随机对照试验;数据以叙述性总结形式呈现。
已确定的证据包括给药或冲洗小口径鼻肠管时使用30毫升水进行冲洗可能会减少管道堵塞。应考虑使用液体制剂,因为与鼻肠管和硅胶经皮内镜下胃造瘘管中的固体制剂相比,液体制剂导致管道堵塞的情况可能更少。此外,护士可能需要考虑某些液体制剂(如酏剂)中的山梨醇含量,因为腹泻被认为与酏剂中的山梨醇含量有关,而非药物本身。
证据有限。在经肠内给药的许多重要问题上缺乏高质量研究。
护士对经肠内管给药负有主要责任,需要了解最佳现有证据。一些与该技能相关的护理注意事项和干预措施已在临床领域进行了研究,并对实践有影响。需要进一步研究以强化这些发现。