• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理学家在虐待儿童案件中的参与。角色与专业知识的局限性。

Psychologists' involvement in cases of child maltreatment. Limits of role and expertise.

作者信息

Melton G B, Limber S

出版信息

Am Psychol. 1989 Sep;44(9):1225-33. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.44.9.1225.

DOI:10.1037//0003-066x.44.9.1225
PMID:2782730
Abstract

As psychologists have become increasingly involved in the investigatory and adjudicative phases of child maltreatment cases and as criminal prosecutions have become increasingly common in such cases, the ethical problems facing psychologists have become more acute. Psychologists involved in cases of child maltreatment should remember their primary duty to promote human dignity. In that regard, care must be taken to protect the rights of the various parties, assist the parties to make use of the legal process, and keep implicit or express promises, including those emanating from professional roles. Psychologists must be careful to avoid intruding into the province of legitimate decision-making authorities.

摘要

随着心理学家越来越多地参与到虐待儿童案件的调查和裁决阶段,并且此类案件中的刑事诉讼也越来越普遍,心理学家面临的伦理问题变得更加尖锐。参与虐待儿童案件的心理学家应牢记其促进人类尊严的首要职责。在这方面,必须注意保护各方的权利,协助各方利用法律程序,并信守隐含或明示的承诺,包括那些源自专业角色的承诺。心理学家必须谨慎避免干涉合法决策当局的职权范围。

相似文献

1
Psychologists' involvement in cases of child maltreatment. Limits of role and expertise.心理学家在虐待儿童案件中的参与。角色与专业知识的局限性。
Am Psychol. 1989 Sep;44(9):1225-33. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.44.9.1225.
2
Client evaluation of a consultation team on crimes against children.客户对一个针对侵害儿童犯罪的咨询团队的评估。
Child Abuse Negl. 2000 Jan;24(1):71-84. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(99)00123-4.
3
Expert psychological testimony in cases of alleged child sexual abuse.涉嫌儿童性虐待案件中的专家心理学证词。
Arch Sex Behav. 1993 Aug;22(4):311-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01542120.
4
Clarifying erroneous child sexual abuse allegations.澄清错误的儿童性虐待指控。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1988 Oct;58(4):618-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1988.tb01627.x.
5
[Allegation of sexual abuses during conflictual divorces].[关于冲突性离婚期间性虐待的指控]
Arch Pediatr. 2006 Jun;13(6):735-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2006.03.048. Epub 2006 May 11.
6
Legal issues in child maltreatment.虐待儿童中的法律问题。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014 Oct;61(5):1049-58. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
7
[Child psychiatric assessment and the debate regarding the abuse of abuse].[儿童精神病学评估与关于虐待滥用的争论]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr. 1995 Mar;23(1):9-19.
8
Extended forensic evaluation when sexual abuse is suspected: a multisite field study.疑似性虐待时的扩展法医评估:一项多地点实地研究。
Child Maltreat. 2001 Aug;6(3):230-42. doi: 10.1177/1077559501006003004.
9
The Harold and Joann Hoffman endowed lecture.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Jun;5(6):537-43. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.PEDS1098.
10
Expert testimony: seeking an appropriate admissibility standard for behavioral science in child sexual abuse prosecutions.专家证词:为儿童性虐待起诉中的行为科学寻求适当的可采性标准。
Duke Law J. 1999 Feb;48(4):933-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert psychological testimony in cases of alleged child sexual abuse.涉嫌儿童性虐待案件中的专家心理学证词。
Arch Sex Behav. 1993 Aug;22(4):311-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01542120.