Suppr超能文献

区分马铃薯块茎伤口愈合两个主要阶段的生物学差异。

Biological differences that distinguish the 2 major stages of wound healing in potato tubers.

作者信息

Lulai Edward C, Campbell Larry G, Fugate Karen K, McCue Kent F

机构信息

a United States Department of Agriculture , Agricultural Research Service, Sugarbeet and Potato Unit, Northern Crop Science Laboratory , Fargo , ND , USA.

b United States Department of Agriculture , Agricultural Research Service, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research , Albany , CA , USA.

出版信息

Plant Signal Behav. 2016 Dec;11(12):e1256531. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1256531.

Abstract

The two stages of potato tuber wound healing, closing layer formation (CLF) and wound periderm formation (WPF), have critical biological differences. The first stage, CLF, involves early induction of DNA synthesis and nuclear division in the absence of cell division. The transition phase from CLF to the second stage, WPF, is marked by a transient decrease in expression of suberin-specific genes. The second stage involves cell division. Although biologically active cytokinins (CKs) are not present in quantifiable amounts during this stage, the presence of precursor and catabolic products suggest the presence of trace amounts of active CKs that, in conjunction with increased auxin (indole acetic acid), provide necessary signals for meristematic activity. Augmenting these putative trace amounts with exogenous biologically active CK inhibits WPF; this suggests that the CK requirements for meristematic activity are finely controlled and sensitive to extremely low concentrations. Evidence is discussed for separate biological processes and signals that distinguish the 2 stages of wound healing.

摘要

马铃薯块茎伤口愈合的两个阶段,即封闭层形成(CLF)和周皮形成(WPF),在生物学上存在关键差异。第一阶段,CLF,涉及在无细胞分裂的情况下早期诱导DNA合成和核分裂。从CLF到第二阶段WPF的过渡阶段,其特征是木栓质特异性基因的表达短暂下降。第二阶段涉及细胞分裂。尽管在此阶段生物活性细胞分裂素(CKs)的含量不可量化,但前体和分解代谢产物的存在表明存在痕量的活性CKs,这些活性CKs与生长素(吲哚乙酸)增加一起,为分生组织活动提供必要信号。用外源生物活性CK增加这些假定的痕量会抑制WPF;这表明分生组织活动对CK的需求受到精细控制,并且对极低浓度敏感。讨论了区分伤口愈合两个阶段的不同生物学过程和信号的证据。

相似文献

1
Biological differences that distinguish the 2 major stages of wound healing in potato tubers.
Plant Signal Behav. 2016 Dec;11(12):e1256531. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1256531.
2
Wounding induces changes in cytokinin and auxin content in potato tuber, but does not induce formation of gibberellins.
J Plant Physiol. 2016 Feb 1;191:22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
3
Kinetics and localization of wound-induced DNA biosynthesis in potato tuber.
J Plant Physiol. 2014 Nov 1;171(17):1571-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
5
Regulatory involvement of abscisic acid in potato tuber wound-healing.
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(6):1175-86. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern019. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
6
Auxins in potato: molecular aspects and emerging roles in tuber formation and stress resistance.
Plant Cell Rep. 2019 Jun;38(6):681-698. doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02395-0. Epub 2019 Feb 9.
8
Anthocyanin synthesis in native and wound periderms of potato.
Physiol Plant. 2015 Apr;153(4):616-26. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12265. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
9
Proteomic evaluation of wound-healing processes in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber tissue.
Proteomics. 2009 Sep;9(17):4154-75. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700649.

引用本文的文献

1
The suberin transporter StABCG1 is required for barrier formation in potato leaves.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 7;15(1):7930. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89032-x.
2
Natural elicitors enhanced suberin polyphenolic accumulation in wounded potato tuber tissues.
Front Plant Sci. 2024 May 28;15:1384602. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1384602. eCollection 2024.
4
The Pathogenicity Factor Thaxtomin A Induces the Production of Phenolic Compounds in Potato Tubers.
Plants (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;11(23):3216. doi: 10.3390/plants11233216.
6
Chemical and Molecular Characterization of Wound-Induced Suberization in Poplar ( × ) Stem Bark.
Plants (Basel). 2022 Apr 22;11(9):1143. doi: 10.3390/plants11091143.
8
Breaking Bad News: Dynamic Molecular Mechanisms of Wound Response in Plants.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 8;11:610445. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.610445. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Wounding induces changes in cytokinin and auxin content in potato tuber, but does not induce formation of gibberellins.
J Plant Physiol. 2016 Feb 1;191:22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
2
Replication stress activates DNA repair synthesis in mitosis.
Nature. 2015 Dec 10;528(7581):286-90. doi: 10.1038/nature16139. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
3
Kinetics and localization of wound-induced DNA biosynthesis in potato tuber.
J Plant Physiol. 2014 Nov 1;171(17):1571-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
Age-induced loss of wound-healing ability in potato tubers is partly regulated by ABA.
Planta. 2010 Nov;232(6):1433-45. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1269-8. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
8
Signals involved in tuber wound-healing.
Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Jul;4(7):620-2. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern019. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
10
Regulatory involvement of abscisic acid in potato tuber wound-healing.
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(6):1175-86. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern019. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验