• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
2
3
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders.体外冲击波疗法治疗肌肉骨骼疾病。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2012 Mar 20;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-11.
4
Electrotherapy modalities for rotator cuff disease.用于肩袖疾病的电疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 10;2016(6):CD012225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012225.
5
Effectiveness of Focused Shockwave Therapy versus Radial Shockwave Therapy for Noncalcific Rotator Cuff Tendinopathies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.聚焦式冲击波疗法与放射状冲击波疗法治疗非钙化性肩袖肌腱病的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jan 9;2021:6687094. doi: 10.1155/2021/6687094. eCollection 2021.
6
Shoulder Arthrogram肩关节造影
7
Mechano-transduction effect of shockwaves in the treatment of lumbar facet joint pain: comparative effectiveness evaluation of shockwave therapy, steroid injections and radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy.冲击波治疗腰椎小关节疼痛的机械转导效应:冲击波疗法、类固醇注射及射频内侧支神经切断术的比较疗效评估
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2014;35(5):393-7.
8
The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy. A systematic review with meta-analysis.体外冲击波疗法治疗肩袖钙化性肌腱炎的疗效。系统评价与荟萃分析。
Physiother Res Int. 2024 Jul;29(3):e2106. doi: 10.1002/pri.2106.
9
Comparative effectiveness radial shockwave therapy versus focused linear shockwave therapy as an erectile dysfunction treatment systematic review and meta-analysis.作为勃起功能障碍治疗方法的径向冲击波疗法与聚焦线性冲击波疗法的比较有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Urol Ann. 2025 Apr-Jun;17(2):84-91. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_13_25. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
10
Retrospective comparison of focused shockwave therapy and radial wave therapy for men with erectile dysfunction.聚焦冲击波疗法与放射波疗法治疗男性勃起功能障碍的回顾性比较
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Oct;9(5):2122-2128. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-911.

PMID:27831676
Abstract

Orthopedic disorders encompass a variety of conditions including rotator cuff tendinopathy (shoulder disorder), epicondylitis (elbow disorder), patellar tendinosis (knee disorder) and plantar fasciitis (foot disorder) and are often associated with pain. Disorders such as these may be associated with decreased productivity or disability that may last several months resulting in a financial burden to society. Conventional therapies used in general practice to manage pain include rest, ice, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, and subacromial corticosteroid injections. Patients unresponsive to such therapies may need to undergo surgical procedures. Shockwave therapy (SWT) may be an alternative to surgical procedures which can be expensive and associated with risk. Other therapeutic modalities include laser therapy, radiation therapy, and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS). SWT involves acoustic waves which carry energy to painful spots and musculoskeletal tissues with subacute, subchronic and chronic conditions. This energy assists in regeneration and repair of bones, tendons and other soft tissues. The exact mechanism of action is not clear. The interaction of shockwaves with tissue is thought to cause analgesia by over stimulation of the treated site resulting in reduced signal transmission to the brainstem, stimulation of tissue healing, breakdown of calcification, alteration of cell membrane permeability, and alteration of cell activity through cavitation. Devices used for SWT vary in design, depending on the way shockwaves are generated and the level of energy that they can produce. SWT includes focused shockwave therapy (FSWT) and radial shockwave therapy (RSWT). FSWT is based on shockwaves of single pressure pulses of a microsecond duration, which are focused on a specific target using ultrasound or radiography guidance. The methods to generate focused shockwaves include electrohydraulic, electromagnetic, or piezoelectric mechanisms. The focused shockwaves are generated in water (inside the applicator) and, as the acoustic impedance of water and biological tissue is comparable, this results in limited reflection and better transmission of the waves into the body. The radial shockwaves for RSWT are generated by acceleration of a projectile, using compressed air, through a tube at the end of which is the applicator. The applicator transmits the generated pressure waves into the body. SWT has been used for over two decades for the treatment soft tissue and bone related musculoskeletal disorders. There is however some debate regarding the effectiveness of SWT compared to placebo or other treatment modalities. A previous CADTH report reviewed the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shockwave therapy for pain associated with upper extremity orthopedic disorders. It reported that compared with placebo, high energy SWT was effective in reducing pain in calcific but not in non-calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Findings on the effectiveness of SWT compared with placebo for treating epicondylitis were inconsistent and no relevant cost-effectiveness studies were identified. The purpose of this report is to review the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shockwave therapy for pain associated with lower extremity orthopedic disorders.

摘要