• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标、信息源和元知觉评定的适应不良特质。

Target-, informant-, and meta-perceptual ratings of maladaptive traits.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2017 Sep;29(9):1142-1156. doi: 10.1037/pas0000417. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000417
PMID:27831728
Abstract

Target-informant agreement about target personality traits can depend on the nature of the traits being considered, whether or not targets or informants are asked to take into account the other's point of view, and the relationship between the informant and the target. This study sought to further explore these patterns by extending existing research in 3 ways in a sample of 335 targets and 548 informants. First, unlike previous research that has focused nearly exclusively on normal range traits with potentially limited clinical relevance or personality disorder categories with questionable validity, we assessed personality using a comprehensive model of maladaptive traits. Second, we gathered 4 sets of ratings: target self-ratings, informant ratings of targets, targets' metaperceptions of how they believe targets would rate them, and informant metaperceptions of how they believe targets would rate themselves. Third, we compared the ratings of informants with different relationships to the targets, including fathers, mothers, siblings, friends, and romantic partners. Results suggest that the degree to which targets and informants agree differs depending on the trait being rated and whether targets or informants metaperceived their trait ratings, and that these differences are particularly apparent when examined within specific kinds of relationships. These results have implications for which informants clinicians might select in clinical personality assessment, as well as for future research on the multimethod assessment of maladaptive traits. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

目标-知情者对目标个性特征的一致性可能取决于所考虑特征的性质,无论目标或知情者是否被要求考虑对方的观点,以及知情者和目标之间的关系。本研究通过在 335 名目标和 548 名知情者的样本中以 3 种方式扩展现有研究,进一步探索了这些模式。首先,与以前几乎完全专注于潜在临床相关性有限的正常范围特征或有效性值得怀疑的人格障碍类别的研究不同,我们使用适应不良特征的综合模型评估人格。其次,我们收集了 4 组评分:目标自我评分、知情者对目标的评分、目标对自己评分的元认知以及知情者对自己评分的元认知。第三,我们比较了与目标具有不同关系的知情者的评分,包括父母、兄弟姐妹、朋友和浪漫伴侣。结果表明,目标和知情者的一致性程度取决于被评估的特征以及目标或知情者对自己特征评分的元认知,并且这些差异在特定关系内进行检查时尤为明显。这些结果对临床人格评估中临床医生可能选择的知情者有影响,也对适应不良特征的多方法评估的未来研究有影响。

相似文献

1
Target-, informant-, and meta-perceptual ratings of maladaptive traits.目标、信息源和元知觉评定的适应不良特质。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Sep;29(9):1142-1156. doi: 10.1037/pas0000417. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
2
Associations between informant ratings of personality disorder traits, self-reports of personality, and directly observed behavior.信息提供者对人格障碍特征的评定、自我报告的人格与直接观察到的行为之间的关系。
J Pers. 2018 Dec;86(6):1078-1101. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12376. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
3
The letter of recommendation effect in informant ratings of personality.推荐人评语效应对人格特质评价的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Apr;98(4):668-82. doi: 10.1037/a0018771.
4
Personality pathology and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples.恋爱和已婚伴侣中的人格病理学与关系满意度。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jan;9(1):81-92. doi: 10.1037/per0000219. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
5
Method biases in single-source personality assessments.单源人格评估中的方法偏差。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1160-1173. doi: 10.1037/pas0000566. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
6
Personality disorder traits: Testing insight regarding presence of traits, impairment, and desire for change.人格障碍特征:测试关于特征、损害和改变意愿的存在的洞察力。
Personal Disord. 2019 Mar;10(2):123-131. doi: 10.1037/per0000305. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
7
Patient-informant agreement on personality ratings and self-awareness after head injury.颅脑损伤后患者与 informant 在人格评分及自我意识方面的一致性。 (注:这里“informant”不太明确具体所指,可能是信息提供者之类的意思,具体含义需结合原文完整语境确定)
Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Sep;20(3):453-68. doi: 10.1080/13854040590967090.
8
Self-report ratings and informants' ratings of personalities of depressed outpatients.抑郁症门诊患者的自我报告评分及他人对其人格的评分。
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;155(3):437-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.3.437.
9
Insight and the Dark Triad: Comparing self- and meta-perceptions in relation to psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism.洞察力与黑暗人格三联征:比较与精神病态、自恋和马基雅维利主义相关的自我和元认知。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jan;9(1):30-39. doi: 10.1037/per0000207. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
10
Relationship between hypomania and personality disorders before and after successful treatment.
Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Feb;152(2):232-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.2.232.

引用本文的文献

1
Wherefrom and Whither PD? Recent Developments and Future Possibilities in DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnosis.人格障碍诊断何去何从?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版和《国际疾病分类》第11版中人格障碍诊断的最新进展与未来可能性
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2025 May;27(5):267-277. doi: 10.1007/s11920-025-01602-y. Epub 2025 Mar 20.