Gregson Rachael Kathleen, Cole Tim James, Skellett Sophie, Bagkeris Emmanouil, Welsby Denise, Peters Mark John
UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Arch Dis Child. 2017 May;102(5):403-409. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310691. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
To determine the effect of visual feedback on rate of chest compressions, secondarily relating the forces used.
Randomised crossover trial.
Tertiary teaching hospital.
Fifty trained hospital staff.
A thin sensor-mat placed over the manikin's chest measured rate and force. Rescuers applied compressions to the same paediatric manikin for two sessions. During one session they received visual feedback comparing their real-time rate with published guidelines.
Primary: compression rate. Secondary: compression and residual forces.
Rate of chest compressions (compressions per minute (compressions per minute; cpm)) varied widely (mean (SD) 111 (13), range 89-168), with a fourfold difference in variation during session 1 between those receiving and not receiving feedback (108 (5) vs 120 (20)). The interaction of session by feedback order was highly significant, indicating that this difference in mean rate between sessions was 14 cpm less (95% CI -22 to -5, p=0.002) in those given feedback first compared with those given it second. Compression force (N) varied widely (mean (SD) 306 (94); range 142-769). Those receiving feedback second (as opposed to first) used significantly lower force (adjusted mean difference -80 (95% CI -128 to -32), p=0.002). Mean residual force (18 N, SD 12, range 0-49) was unaffected by the intervention.
While visual feedback restricted excessive compression rates to within the prescribed range, applied force remained widely variable. The forces required may differ with growth, but such variation treating one manikin is alarming. Feedback technologies additionally measuring force (effort) could help to standardise and define effective treatments throughout childhood.
确定视觉反馈对胸外按压速率的影响,并其次关联所使用的力量。
随机交叉试验。
三级教学医院。
五十名经过培训的医院工作人员。
在人体模型胸部放置一个薄的传感器垫来测量速率和力量。救援人员对同一个儿科人体模型进行两次按压操作。在一次操作中,他们会收到视觉反馈,将他们的实时速率与公布的指南进行比较。
主要指标:按压速率。次要指标:按压力量和残余力量。
胸外按压速率(每分钟按压次数;cpm)差异很大(均值(标准差)111(13),范围89 - 168),在第1次操作中,接受反馈和未接受反馈的人员之间的变化差异为四倍(108(5)对120(20))。按反馈顺序分组的操作之间的交互作用非常显著,表明与第二次给予反馈的人员相比,第一次给予反馈的人员在各次操作之间的平均速率差异少14 cpm(95%置信区间 -22至 -5,p = 0.002)。按压力量(牛顿)差异很大(均值(标准差)306(94);范围142 - 769)。第二次接受反馈的人员(与第一次相比)使用的力量明显更低(调整后的平均差异 -80(95%置信区间 -128至 -32),p = 0.002)。平均残余力量(18牛顿,标准差12,范围0 - 49)不受干预影响。
虽然视觉反馈将过高的按压速率限制在规定范围内,但施加的力量仍然差异很大。所需力量可能随生长而不同,但在处理同一个人体模型时出现这种差异令人担忧。额外测量力量(力度)的反馈技术可能有助于在整个儿童期标准化并确定有效的治疗方法。