Srikantan Shoba Krishnan, Berg Robert A, Cox Tim, Tice Lisa, Nadkarni Vinay M
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 May;6(3):293-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000161621.74554.15.
Optimal chest compression to ventilation ratio (C:V) for one-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is not known, with current American Heart Association recommendations 3:1 for newborns, 5:1 for children, and 15:2 for adults. C:V ratios influence effectiveness of CPR, but memorizing different ratios is educationally cumbersome. We hypothesized that a 10:2 ratio might provide adequate universal application for all age arrest victims.
Clinical study.
Tertiary care children's hospital.
Thirty-five health care providers.
Thirty-five health care providers performed 5-min epochs of one-rescuer CPR at C:V ratios of 3:1, 5:1, 10:2, and 15:2 in random order on infant, pediatric, and adult manikins. Compressions were paced at 100/min by metronome. The number of effective compressions and ventilations delivered per minute was recorded by a trained basic life support instructor. Subjective assessments of fatigue (self-report) and exertion (change in rescuer pulse rate compared with baseline) were assessed. Analysis was by repeated measures analysis of variance and paired Student's t-test.
Effective infant compressions per minute did not differ by C:V ratio, but ventilations per minute were greater at 3:1 vs. 5:1, 10:2, and 15:2 (p < .05). Effective pediatric compressions per minute were less at 3:1 vs. 5:1, 10:2, and 15:2 (p < .05) and not different between 5:1, 10:2, and 15:2 ratios. Effective pediatric ventilations per minute were greater at 3:1 than all other ratios and both 5:1 and 10:2 were >15:2 (p < .05). Effective adult compressions per minute were progressively greater with 3:1 vs. 5:1 vs. 10:2 vs. 15:2 (p < .05). Self-efficacy was assessed, and rescuers always subjectively rated 10:2 and 15:2 ratios as easier than 5:1 or 3:1 ratios for all manikins. Rescuer pulse change (exertion) was greater after pediatric and adult vs. infant CPR (p < .05), with no significant difference by C:V ratio.
C:V ratio and manikin size have a significant influence on the number of effective compressions and ventilations delivered during ideal, metronome-paced, one-rescuer CPR. Low ratios of 3:1, 5:1, and 10:2 favor ventilation, and high ratios of 15:2 favor compression, especially in adult manikins. Rescuers subjectively preferred C:V ratios of 10:2 and 15:2 over 3:1 or 5:1. Infant CPR caused less exertion and subjective fatigue than pediatric or adult CPR technique, without significant difference by C:V ratio. We speculate that a universal 10:2 C:V ratio for one-rescuer layperson CPR is physiologically reasonable but warrants further study with particular attention to educational value and technique retention.
单人实施心肺复苏(CPR)时的最佳胸外按压与通气比(C:V)尚不明确,目前美国心脏协会的建议是新生儿为3:1,儿童为5:1,成人为15:2。C:V比会影响心肺复苏的效果,但记住不同的比例在教学上较为繁琐。我们推测10:2的比例可能对所有年龄段的心脏骤停患者都能提供足够广泛的适用性。
临床研究。
三级护理儿童医院。
35名医护人员。
35名医护人员按照随机顺序,分别以3:1、5:1、10:2和15:2的C:V比,在婴儿、儿童和成人模拟人上进行5分钟的单人CPR。按压由节拍器设定为每分钟100次。由一名经过培训的基础生命支持教员记录每分钟有效的按压次数和通气次数。对疲劳(自我报告)和劳累程度(与基线相比施救者脉搏率的变化)进行主观评估。采用重复测量方差分析和配对学生t检验进行分析。
每分钟有效的婴儿按压次数不受C:V比的影响,但3:1时每分钟的通气次数高于5:1、10:2和15:2(p < 0.05)。3:1时每分钟有效的儿童按压次数低于5:1、10:2和15:2(p < 0.05),而5:1、10:2和15:2这几个比例之间无差异。3:1时每分钟有效的儿童通气次数高于所有其他比例,且5:1和10:2均高于15:2(p < 0.05)。3:1、5:1、10:2和15:2时,每分钟有效的成人按压次数逐渐增加(p < 0.05)。评估了自我效能,施救者主观上始终认为,对于所有模拟人,10:2和15:2的比例比5:1或3:1的比例更容易操作。与婴儿CPR相比,儿童和成人CPR后施救者的脉搏变化(劳累程度)更大(p < 0.05),且C:V比之间无显著差异。
在理想的、由节拍器控制的单人CPR过程中,C:V比和模拟人的尺寸对有效按压次数和通气次数有显著影响。3:1、5:1和10:2的低比例有利于通气,15:2的高比例有利于按压,尤其是在成人模拟人上。施救者主观上更喜欢10:2和15:2的C:V比,而不是3:1或5:1。与儿童或成人CPR技术相比,婴儿CPR导致的劳累和主观疲劳更少,且C:V比之间无显著差异。我们推测,对于单人非专业人员实施的CPR,通用 的10:2 C:V比在生理上是合理的,但值得进一步研究,尤其要关注其教育价值和技术保持情况。