Suppr超能文献

论从多个证人证言重建犯罪时考虑证人能力水平异质性的重要性。

On the importance of considering heterogeneity in witnesses' competence levels when reconstructing crimes from multiple witness testimonies.

作者信息

Waubert de Puiseau Berenike, Greving Sven, Aßfalg André, Musch Jochen

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Duesseldorf, Universitaetsstrasse 1, Building 23.03, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2017 Sep;81(5):947-960. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0802-1. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

Abstract

Aggregating information across multiple testimonies may improve crime reconstructions. However, different aggregation methods are available, and research on which method is best suited for aggregating multiple observations is lacking. Furthermore, little is known about how variance in the accuracy of individual testimonies impacts the performance of competing aggregation procedures. We investigated the superiority of aggregation-based crime reconstructions involving multiple individual testimonies and whether this superiority varied as a function of the number of witnesses and the degree of heterogeneity in witnesses' ability to accurately report their observations. Moreover, we examined whether heterogeneity in competence levels differentially affected the relative accuracy of two aggregation procedures: a simple majority rule, which ignores individual differences, and the more complex general Condorcet model (Romney et al., Am Anthropol 88(2):313-338, 1986; Batchelder and Romney, Psychometrika 53(1):71-92, 1988), which takes into account differences in competence between individuals. 121 participants viewed a simulated crime and subsequently answered 128 true/false questions about the crime. We experimentally generated groups of witnesses with homogeneous or heterogeneous competences. Both the majority rule and the general Condorcet model provided more accurate reconstructions of the observed crime than individual testimonies. The superiority of aggregated crime reconstructions involving multiple individual testimonies increased with an increasing number of witnesses. Crime reconstructions were most accurate when competences were heterogeneous and aggregation was based on the general Condorcet model. We argue that a formal aggregation should be considered more often when eyewitness testimonies have to be assessed and that the general Condorcet model provides a good framework for such aggregations.

摘要

整合多个证人的信息可能会改善犯罪重建。然而,有多种不同的整合方法,目前缺乏关于哪种方法最适合整合多个观察结果的研究。此外,对于个体证人准确性的差异如何影响不同整合程序的性能,人们知之甚少。我们研究了基于多个个体证人陈述的犯罪重建的优越性,以及这种优越性是否会随着证人数量和证人准确报告其观察结果能力的异质性程度而变化。此外,我们还考察了能力水平的异质性是否会对两种整合程序的相对准确性产生不同影响:一种是简单多数规则,它忽略个体差异;另一种是更复杂的一般孔多塞模型(Romney等人,《美国人类学家》88(2):313 - 338, 1986;Batchelder和Romney,《心理测量学》53(1):71 - 92, 1988),该模型考虑了个体之间的能力差异。121名参与者观看了一段模拟犯罪视频,随后回答了128个关于该犯罪的是非问题。我们通过实验生成了能力同质或异质的证人组。多数规则和一般孔多塞模型都比个体证人陈述提供了更准确的犯罪重建。涉及多个个体证人陈述的聚合犯罪重建的优越性随着证人数量的增加而提高。当能力异质且基于一般孔多塞模型进行整合时,犯罪重建最为准确。我们认为,在必须评估目击证人陈述时,应更频繁地考虑正式的整合,并且一般孔多塞模型为这种整合提供了一个良好的框架。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验