Suppr超能文献

一项关于快速诊断检测对血培养阳性儿童病原体鉴定时间及抗生素使用影响的回顾性研究。

A Retrospective Study of the Impact of Rapid Diagnostic Testing on Time to Pathogen Identification and Antibiotic Use for Children with Positive Blood Cultures.

作者信息

Veesenmeyer Angela Fimbres, Olson Jared A, Hersh Adam L, Stockmann Chris, Korgenski Kent, Thorell Emily A, Pavia Andrew T, Blaschke Anne J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Infect Dis Ther. 2016 Dec;5(4):555-570. doi: 10.1007/s40121-016-0136-8. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rapid identification of bloodstream pathogens provides crucial information that can improve the choice of antimicrobial therapy for children. Previous impact studies have primarily focused on adults. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of rapid testing in a children's hospital on time to organism identification and antibiotic use in the setting of an established antimicrobial stewardship program.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study over three consecutive time periods (spanning January 2013-August 2015) as our hospital sequentially introduced two rapid testing methods for positive blood cultures. An antimicrobial stewardship program was active throughout the study. In the baseline period, no rapid diagnostic methods were routinely utilized. In the second period (PNAFISH), a fluorescent in situ hybridization test was implemented for gram-positive organisms and in the third a rapid multiplex PCR (rmPCR) test was employed. For children with positive blood cultures, time to organism identification use and duration of select antimicrobial therapies were compared between periods.

RESULTS

Positive blood cultures were analyzed. Median overall time to organism identification was 23, 11, and 0 h in the baseline, PNAFISH, and rmPCR periods, respectively (p < 0.001 for both PNAFISH and rmPCR vs. baseline). For gram-negative organisms, only rmPCR performed significantly faster than baseline (p < 0.001). The duration of vancomycin use for coagulase-negative staphylococci was shorter in both the PNAFISH and rmPCR periods (mean 31 h in the baseline period, 12 and 14 h in the PNAFISH and rmPCR periods, respectively). For MSSA bacteremia, use of vancomycin was significantly decreased only in the rmPCR period (32% of patients vs. 64 and 72% in the baseline and PNAFISH periods; mean duration of 9 h vs. 30 and 26 h). There was no difference in use or duration of broad-spectrum gram-negative therapy across the three time periods.

CONCLUSION

Rapid diagnostic testing for children with positive blood cultures results in faster time to identification and can influence antibiotic prescribing in the setting of active antimicrobial stewardship particularly for gram-positive pathogens.

FUNDING

Merck.

摘要

引言

快速鉴定血流病原体可提供关键信息,有助于改善儿童抗菌治疗方案的选择。以往的影响研究主要集中在成人。我们的目的是评估在一家儿童医院开展快速检测对在既定抗菌药物管理计划背景下病原体鉴定时间和抗生素使用的影响。

方法

我们在连续三个时间段(2013年1月至2015年8月)进行了一项回顾性研究,期间我院相继引入了两种针对血培养阳性的快速检测方法。在整个研究过程中,抗菌药物管理计划一直在实施。在基线期,未常规使用快速诊断方法。在第二个时间段(肽核酸荧光原位杂交试验,PNAFISH),对革兰氏阳性菌实施了荧光原位杂交检测,在第三个时间段采用了快速多重聚合酶链反应(rmPCR)检测。对血培养阳性的儿童,比较各时间段之间的病原体鉴定时间、抗生素使用情况以及选定抗菌治疗的持续时间。

结果

对血培养阳性结果进行了分析。在基线期、PNAFISH期和rmPCR期,病原体鉴定的总体中位时间分别为23小时、11小时和0小时(PNAFISH期和rmPCR期与基线期相比,P均<0.001)。对于革兰氏阴性菌,只有rmPCR检测的速度明显快于基线期(P<0.001)。在PNAFISH期和rmPCR期,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌使用万古霉素的持续时间均较短(基线期平均为31小时,PNAFISH期和rmPCR期分别为12小时和14小时)。对于甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症,仅在rmPCR期万古霉素的使用显著减少(患者比例分别为32%,而基线期和PNAFISH期分别为64%和72%;平均持续时间分别为9小时,而基线期和PNAFISH期分别为30小时和26小时)。在三个时间段内,广谱革兰氏阴性菌治疗的使用情况和持续时间没有差异。

结论

对血培养阳性的儿童进行快速诊断检测可加快病原体鉴定时间,并能在积极的抗菌药物管理背景下影响抗生素处方,尤其是对于革兰氏阳性病原体。

资助

默克公司。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c39/5125139/e85a9d7ef12f/40121_2016_136_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验