Shin Hee Sup, Lee Seung Hwan, Ko Hak Cheol, Koh Jun Seok
Department of Neurosurgery, Stroke and Neurological Disorders Centre, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Stroke and Neurological Disorders Centre, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:774-779. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.142. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
Even although microvascular decompression is the standard treatment for hemifacial spasm (HFS), the treatment is not always 100% successful. Some patients experience the reappearance of HFS after temporary relief after surgery. We analyzed our data to elucidate the reasons for and prognosis of HFS reappearance, specifically focusing on exact compressive location of the facial nerve.
The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, the patients whose symptoms of spasm disappeared immediately after surgery but recurred within a month, and group B, the patients whose symptoms of spasm completely disappeared and never recurred. We adopted the terms of subdivision in the facial nerve root exit zone: RExP, root exit point; AS, attached segment; RDP, root detachment point; TZ, transition zone; and CP, distal cisternal portion.
Among 115 patients, 56 (48.7%) belonged to group A and 59 (51.3%) to group B. In 54 of the 56 patients in group A (96.4%), the reappearing HFS disappeared gradually over several weeks. The precise location of compression in group A was at the RExP in 46.4% of the patients, AS in 33.9%, RDP in 16.1%, and TZ in 3.6%, and the RExP compression was significantly more frequent compared with in group B.
After microvascular decompression for HFS, almost half of the patients experienced transient HFS recurrence despite sufficient decompression of the facial nerve. However, in most cases, recurrent HFS gradually resolved over a period. Based on the compression location, the surgeon could anticipate recurrence of transient HFS.
尽管微血管减压术是治疗面肌痉挛(HFS)的标准方法,但该治疗并非总是100%成功。一些患者在术后短暂缓解后会出现HFS复发。我们分析了我们的数据,以阐明HFS复发的原因和预后,特别关注面神经的确切受压部位。
将患者分为两组:A组,术后痉挛症状立即消失但在1个月内复发的患者;B组,痉挛症状完全消失且未复发的患者。我们采用了面神经根出脑区的细分术语:RExP,根出点;AS,附着段;RDP,根脱离点;TZ,过渡区;CP,脑池远端部分。
115例患者中,56例(48.7%)属于A组,59例(51.3%)属于B组。A组56例患者中有54例(96.4%),复发的HFS在几周内逐渐消失。A组中压迫的确切位置在根出点的患者占46.4%,附着段占33.9%,根脱离点占16.1%,过渡区占3.6%,与B组相比,根出点受压明显更频繁。
在微血管减压治疗HFS后,尽管面神经减压充分,但几乎一半的患者经历了短暂的HFS复发。然而,在大多数情况下,复发性HFS会在一段时间内逐渐缓解。根据压迫部位,外科医生可以预测短暂性HFS的复发。