Suppr超能文献

在线公开平台上外科医生的排名与客观结果相关吗?

Does the ranking of surgeons in a publicly available online platform correlate with objective outcomes?

机构信息

Section of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;127(2):353-359. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16583. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The accuracy of public reporting in health care, especially from private vendors, remains an issue of debate. The authors investigated the association of the publicly reported physician complication rates in an online platform with real-world adverse outcomes of the same physicians for patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion. METHODS The authors performed a cohort study involving physicians performing posterior lumbar fusions between 2009 and 2013 who were registered in the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. This cohort was merged with publicly available data over the same time period from ProPublica, a private company. Mixed-effects multivariable regression models were used to investigate the association of publicly available complication rates with the rate of discharge to a rehabilitation facility, length of stay, mortality, and hospitalization charges for the same surgeons. RESULTS During the selected study period, there were 8,457 patients in New York State who underwent posterior lumbar fusion performed by the 56 surgeons represented in the ProPublica Surgeon Scorecard over the same time period. Using a mixed-effects multivariable regression model, the authors demonstrated that publicly reported physician-level complication rates were not associated with the rate of discharge to a rehabilitation facility (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72-1.31), length of stay (adjusted difference -0.1, 95% CI -0.5 to 0.2), mortality (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.49-1.55), and hospitalization charges (adjusted difference $18,735, 95% CI -$59,177 to $96,647). Similarly, no association was observed when utilizing propensity score-adjusted models, and when restricting the cohort to a predefined subgroup of Medicare patients. CONCLUSIONS After merging a comprehensive all-payer posterior lumbar fusion cohort in New York State with data from the ProPublica Surgeon Scorecard over the same time period, the authors observed no association of publicly available physician complication rates with objective outcomes.

摘要

目的

医疗保健领域,尤其是私营供应商的公开报告准确性,仍然是一个存在争议的问题。作者研究了在线平台上公开报告的医生并发症率与同一医生进行后路腰椎融合术的患者实际不良结果之间的关联。

方法

作者进行了一项队列研究,涉及 2009 年至 2013 年间在全州规划和研究合作系统数据库中注册的进行后路腰椎融合术的医生。该队列与同期来自私营公司 ProPublica 的公开可用数据合并。使用混合效应多变量回归模型,研究公开可用的并发症率与同一外科医生的康复设施出院率、住院时间、死亡率和住院费用之间的关联。

结果

在选定的研究期间,纽约州有 8457 名患者接受了 ProPublica 外科医生评分卡中同一时期的 56 名外科医生进行的后路腰椎融合术。使用混合效应多变量回归模型,作者表明公开报告的医生级别的并发症率与康复设施出院率(OR 0.97,95%CI 0.72-1.31)、住院时间(调整差异-0.1,95%CI-0.5 至 0.2)、死亡率(OR 0.87,95%CI 0.49-1.55)和住院费用(调整差异$18735,95%CI-59177 至 96647)之间没有关联。同样,当使用倾向评分调整模型和将队列限制在预先定义的 Medicare 患者亚组时,也没有观察到关联。

结论

在将纽约州全面支付的后路腰椎融合术队列与同期 ProPublica 外科医生评分卡的数据合并后,作者观察到公开可用的医生并发症率与客观结果之间没有关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验