Suppr超能文献

流感快速诊断检测的系统评价:社区药剂师的考量因素

A systematic review of rapid diagnostic tests for influenza: considerations for the community pharmacist.

作者信息

Koski Renee R, Klepser Michael E

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Jan-Feb;57(1):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.08.018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) have a potential role in community pharmacy to optimize influenza infection management. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed changes to the classification of RIDTs may affect their use in community pharmacy. We reviewed the performance and features of RIDTs likely to meet FDA-proposed reclassification requirements.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Medline database searches were performed using the terms "Sofia Influenza A and B Fluorescent Immunoassay," "BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of Flu A and B", and "Alere i Influenza A and B."

STUDY SELECTION

All studies involving the use of the BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of Flu A+B (BD Veritor, Sparks, MD), the Sofia Influenza A+B Fluorescent Immunoassay (Sofia FIA, San Diego, CA), and Alere i Influenza A&B (Alere i, Scarborough, ME) containing sensitivities and specificities with confidence intervals were considered for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Patient demographics, specimen type collected, setting, sensitivities, specificities, true positives, true negatives, false positives, false negatives, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were extracted.

RESULTS

Of the 22 studies identified, 14 contained sufficient data to incorporate into this review. One study contained comparative data for BD Veritor and Sofia FIA, 1 study compared Alere i and Sofia FIA, 2 studies specifically included BD Veritor, 5 studies specifically included Sofia FIA, and 5 studies specifically included Alere i. Performance characteristics among the RIDTs varied; however, all 3 RIDTs consistently provided sensitivities and specificities >70%.

CONCLUSION

BD Veritor, Sofia FIA, and Alere i RIDTs performed well compared with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction or viral culture. These RIDTs are likely to satisfy the proposed reclassification requirements. Pharmacists are considered the most accessible health care providers, and implementing RIDT services in community pharmacy may benefit health systems.

摘要

目的

快速流感诊断检测(RIDTs)在社区药房中对于优化流感感染管理具有潜在作用。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)提议对RIDTs的分类进行更改,这可能会影响其在社区药房中的使用。我们回顾了可能符合FDA提议的重新分类要求的RIDTs的性能和特点。

数据来源

使用“Sofia甲型和乙型流感荧光免疫测定法”“BD Veritor甲型和乙型流感快速检测系统”以及“Alere i甲型和乙型流感”等术语在PubMed和Medline数据库中进行检索。

研究选择

所有涉及使用BD Veritor甲型和乙型流感快速检测系统(BD Veritor,斯帕克斯,马里兰州)、Sofia甲型和乙型流感荧光免疫测定法(Sofia FIA,圣地亚哥,加利福尼亚州)以及Alere i甲型和乙型流感(Alere i,斯卡伯勒,缅因州)且包含带有置信区间的敏感性和特异性的研究均被考虑纳入。

数据提取

提取患者人口统计学信息、采集的标本类型、环境、敏感性、特异性、真阳性、真阴性、假阳性、假阴性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。

结果

在确定的22项研究中,14项包含足够的数据可纳入本综述。1项研究包含BD Veritor和Sofia FIA的比较数据,1项研究比较了Alere i和Sofia FIA,2项研究专门纳入了BD Veritor,5项研究专门纳入了Sofia FIA,5项研究专门纳入了Alere i。RIDTs之间的性能特征各不相同;然而,所有这三种RIDTs始终提供大于70%的敏感性和特异性。

结论

与逆转录聚合酶链反应或病毒培养相比,BD Veritor、Sofia FIA和Alere i RIDTs表现良好。这些RIDTs可能满足提议的重新分类要求。药剂师被认为是最易接触到的医疗保健提供者,在社区药房实施RIDT服务可能会使卫生系统受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验