Holzer Timothy R, O'Neill Reising Leslie, Credille Kelly M, Schade Andrew E, Oakley Gerard J
Diagnostic and Experimental Pathology, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (TRH, LOR, KMC, AES, GJO).
J Histochem Cytochem. 2016 Dec;64(12):785-810. doi: 10.1369/0022155416673979.
Aberrant regulation of the receptor tyrosine kinase platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRα) is implicated in several types of cancer. Inhibition of the PDGFRα pathway may be a beneficial therapy, and detection of PDGFRα in tumor biopsies may lead to insights about which patients respond to therapy. Exploratory or clinical biomarker use of PDGFRα IHC has been frequently reported, often with polyclonal antibody sc-338. An sc-338-based assay was systematically compared with anti-PDGFRα rabbit monoclonal antibody D13C6 using immunoblot profiling and IHC in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded human tumor cell lines. Application of sc-338 to blots of whole cell lysates showed multiple bands including some of unknown origin, whereas application of D13C6 resulted in a prominent band at the expected molecular mass of PDGFRα. The IHC assay using D13C6 showed appropriate staining in cell lines, whereas the assay using sc-338 suggested nonspecific detection of proteins. An optimized IHC assay using D13C6 showed a range of staining in the tumor stromal compartment in lung and ovarian carcinomas. These observations suggest that use of clone sc-338 produced unreliable results and should not be used for an IHC research grade assay. In addition, this precludes its use as a potential antibody for a clinical diagnostic tool.
受体酪氨酸激酶血小板衍生生长因子α(PDGFRα)的异常调节与多种癌症有关。抑制PDGFRα途径可能是一种有益的治疗方法,在肿瘤活检中检测PDGFRα可能有助于了解哪些患者对治疗有反应。PDGFRα免疫组化作为探索性或临床生物标志物的应用经常被报道,通常使用多克隆抗体sc-338。在福尔马林固定石蜡包埋的人肿瘤细胞系中,使用免疫印迹分析和免疫组化,将基于sc-338的检测方法与抗PDGFRα兔单克隆抗体D13C6进行了系统比较。将sc-338应用于全细胞裂解物印迹显示多条条带,包括一些来源不明的条带,而应用D13C6则在PDGFRα预期分子量处出现一条明显的条带。使用D13C6的免疫组化检测在细胞系中显示出适当的染色,而使用sc-338的检测表明存在蛋白质的非特异性检测。使用D13C6的优化免疫组化检测在肺癌和卵巢癌的肿瘤间质区显示出一系列染色。这些观察结果表明,使用克隆sc-338产生的结果不可靠,不应将其用于免疫组化研究级检测。此外,这也排除了将其用作临床诊断工具的潜在抗体的可能性。