Mancuso Michael Robert, Massarweh Suleiman Alfred
Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, 94305.
Curr Probl Cancer. 2016 Mar-Aug;40(2-4):95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
Despite the remarkable success of endocrine therapy in the treatment of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)- positive breast cancer, not all patients derive benefit from such therapy, or may benefit only temporarily before disease progression or relapse occurs. The value of endocrine therapy, which blocks ER signaling by a variety of strategies, lies in its simplicity, lower toxicity, and better alignment with preserved quality of life, particularly when compared to chemotherapy, which is more toxic and has only modest benefits for many patients with ER-positive breast cancer. It is therefore critical that we discover ways to extend endocrine therapy benefit in patients and prevent therapeutic resistance whenever possible. The tremendous evolution in our understanding of endocrine resistance mechanisms, coupled with the increasing availability of novel agents that target resistance pathways, has led to enhanced treatment approaches for patients with ER-positive breast cancer, primarily through combinations of endocrine agents with a variety of pathway inhibitors. Despite these treatment advances and our changing view of ER-positive breast cancer, there is much work that needs to be done. It remains a problem that we cannot reliably predict which subsets of patients will experience disease relapse or progression on endocrine therapy, and as such, combination strategies with targeted agents have largely been used in unselected patients with ER-positive breast cancer, including those who continue to have endocrine-sensitive disease. Patient selection is a significant issue since most of the targeted therapeutics that we use with endocrine therapy are expensive and can be toxic, and we may be inadvertently overtreating patients whose disease can still be controlled with endocrine therapy alone. In this article, we will review current and future strategies in the treatment of ER-positive breast cancer, as well as the evolving role of targeted therapy in the management of endocrine-resistance.
尽管内分泌疗法在治疗雌激素受体(ER)阳性乳腺癌患者方面取得了显著成功,但并非所有患者都能从这种疗法中获益,或者可能仅在疾病进展或复发前暂时获益。内分泌疗法通过多种策略阻断ER信号传导,其价值在于操作简便、毒性较低,且与维持生活质量更为契合,尤其是与化疗相比,化疗毒性更大,对许多ER阳性乳腺癌患者的益处有限。因此,至关重要的是我们要找到方法来扩大内分泌疗法对患者的益处,并尽可能预防治疗耐药性。我们对内分泌耐药机制的理解有了巨大进展,再加上越来越多针对耐药途径的新型药物可供使用,这主要通过将内分泌药物与多种途径抑制剂联合使用,从而为ER阳性乳腺癌患者带来了更好的治疗方法。尽管有这些治疗进展以及我们对ER阳性乳腺癌的看法不断变化,但仍有许多工作要做。我们无法可靠地预测哪些患者亚群在内分泌治疗中会出现疾病复发或进展,这仍然是一个问题。因此,与靶向药物的联合策略在很大程度上已用于未经过选择的ER阳性乳腺癌患者,包括那些仍有内分泌敏感性疾病的患者。患者选择是一个重要问题,因为我们与内分泌疗法联合使用的大多数靶向治疗药物价格昂贵且可能有毒性,我们可能会无意中过度治疗那些仅用内分泌疗法就能控制疾病的患者。在本文中,我们将综述ER阳性乳腺癌治疗的当前和未来策略,以及靶向治疗在内分泌耐药管理中不断演变的作用。