Dickson J, Liu D, Bloomfield D
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Middlesex, UK.
Royal College of Radiologists, London, UK.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Mar;29(3):e64-e71. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
To seek feedback from clinical oncologists as to their experiences of specialty training and, where applicable, the transition to working as a consultant in the National Health Service.
All clinical oncologists gaining a Certificate of Completion of Training between 1 July 2012 and 30 June 2014 were identified through records held by the Royal College of Radiologists and approached in May 2015 to take part in an online survey.
The survey was completed by 38 of 80 clinical oncologists invited to take part (48% response rate). Most respondents (>87%) agreed that specialty training equipped them well with clinical skills in radiotherapy planning, systemic therapy and tumour site diagnosis and treatment. This fell to 58% with advanced radiotherapy techniques. Of the non-clinical skills, respondents felt training had equipped them less to deal with leadership and management (53%) and research (48%) than clinical governance (61%). Despite wanting to do so, 42% of respondents did not undertake any out-of-programme (OOP) activity to gain new skills. Most of those respondents who did undertake OOP activity agreed that it helped to prepare them for their first consultant post. There is broad support for the FRCR Examination. The First FRCR Examination modules in physics, pharmacology, tumour biology and radiobiology were seen to be very relevant to clinical practice by 50% or more of respondents. The Final FRCR Examination was seen as essential in a technical specialty like clinical oncology by 92% of respondents. Working as a new consultant, the survey revealed a heavy workload for most respondents, with 69% always or almost always working beyond contracted hours. Other issues of concern identified were discrepancies in advertised consultant job plans and ineffectiveness of the job plan review process. The trainee-consultant transition is often a difficult time, yet only 19% of respondents were allocated a formal mentor. Most respondents had to rely on informal arrangements in seeking support and advice from medical colleagues.
In general, respondents were satisfied with their specialty training and the transition from training to working as a new consultant. Areas for possible improvement have been identified for employers as well as those involved in organising specialty training.
征求临床肿瘤学家关于其专科培训经历的反馈,以及在适用情况下,关于向英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的顾问医生岗位过渡的反馈。
通过皇家放射科医师学院保存的记录,识别出在2012年7月1日至2014年6月30日期间获得培训结业证书的所有临床肿瘤学家,并于2015年5月联系他们参加在线调查。
受邀参加调查的80名临床肿瘤学家中有38名完成了调查(回复率为48%)。大多数受访者(>87%)认为专科培训使他们在放射治疗计划、系统治疗以及肿瘤部位诊断和治疗方面具备了良好的临床技能。对于先进的放射治疗技术,这一比例降至58%。在非临床技能方面,受访者认为培训使他们在应对领导与管理(53%)和研究(48%)方面的能力不如临床治理(61%)。尽管有意愿,但42%的受访者未参加任何计划外(OOP)活动以获取新技能。大多数参加计划外活动的受访者认为这有助于他们为首个顾问医生岗位做好准备。对皇家放射科医师学院考试(FRCR)普遍表示支持。50%或更多的受访者认为物理、药理学、肿瘤生物学和放射生物学方面的首次FRCR考试模块与临床实践高度相关。92%的受访者认为最终FRCR考试在临床肿瘤学这样的技术专科中至关重要。调查显示,作为新的顾问医生,大多数受访者工作量很大,69%的人总是或几乎总是在合同规定的工作时间之外工作。其他被发现的问题包括招聘顾问医生岗位计划中的差异以及岗位计划审查流程的无效性。从实习医生到顾问医生的过渡通常是一段艰难时期,但只有19%的受访者被分配了正式导师。大多数受访者在寻求医疗同事的支持和建议时不得不依赖非正式安排。
总体而言,受访者对其专科培训以及从培训到成为新顾问医生的过渡感到满意。已为雇主以及参与组织专科培训的各方确定了可能需要改进的领域。