Lewinson Ryan T, Maag Chad P, Lun Victor M Y, Wiley J Preston, Patel Chirag, Stefanyshyn Darren J
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Knee. 2017 Jan;24(1):31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
Clinical effectiveness of lateral wedges for knee osteoarthritis is inconsistent across studies. One explanation is that knee loading is not fully described by the peak frontal-plane knee moment. The purpose of this study was to propose a 3D resultant approach to describing moments at the knee and evaluate how this moment changes in response to lateral wedges.
Walking gait analysis was performed on 20 individuals with knee osteoarthritis, in their own shoes, with and without a six millimeter lateral wedge insole. Frontal-plane and 3D resultant moments were calculated for each participant and footwear condition. Paired t-tests identified differences between footwear conditions, correlations identified relationships between frontal-plane and 3D resultant moments, and regressions assessed relationships between moments and pain.
Significant reductions to peak frontal-plane moments (p=0.001) and 3D resultant moments at the same time point (p=0.042) were observed with lateral wedges. While an overall significant correlation was observed between change in frontal-plane moments and change in 3D resultant moments with a lateral wedge (r=0.68, p=0.001), 5/20 participants experienced disparate results where the frontal-plane moment was reduced yet the 3D moment increased.
While lateral wedges alter frontal-plane moment magnitude, the direction of change does not always correspond to the direction of change observed in the 3D resultant moment. Thus resultant knee load may sometimes increase with lateral wedges.
Future prospective studies should evaluate if changes in 3D resultant moments, and thus total knee load, offer an explanation as to why some participants do not experience clinical benefit from lateral wedges.
关于外侧楔形鞋垫对膝关节骨关节炎的临床疗效,各项研究结果并不一致。一种解释是,额状面膝关节力矩峰值并不能完全描述膝关节负荷情况。本研究的目的是提出一种三维合力方法来描述膝关节力矩,并评估该力矩如何因外侧楔形鞋垫而变化。
对20名膝关节骨关节炎患者进行步行步态分析,患者穿着自己的鞋子,分别在有和没有6毫米外侧楔形鞋垫的情况下进行测试。计算每位参与者在每种鞋类条件下的额状面力矩和三维合力矩。配对t检验确定不同鞋类条件之间的差异,相关性分析确定额状面力矩和三维合力矩之间的关系,回归分析评估力矩与疼痛之间的关系。
使用外侧楔形鞋垫时,在同一时间点观察到额状面力矩峰值(p = 0.001)和三维合力矩均显著降低(p = 0.042)。虽然观察到外侧楔形鞋垫使额状面力矩变化与三维合力矩变化之间总体存在显著相关性(r = 0.68,p = 0.001),但20名参与者中有5人出现了不同的结果,即额状面力矩降低而三维力矩增加。
虽然外侧楔形鞋垫会改变额状面力矩大小,但变化方向并不总是与三维合力矩的变化方向一致。因此,使用外侧楔形鞋垫时膝关节合力负荷有时可能会增加。
未来的前瞻性研究应评估三维合力矩的变化以及由此导致的膝关节总负荷变化,是否能解释为何有些参与者未从外侧楔形鞋垫中获得临床益处。