Fukuchi Claudiane A, Lewinson Ryan T, Worobets Jay T, Stefanyshyn Darren J
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2016 Nov;106(6):411-418. doi: 10.7547/15-077.
Wedged insoles have been used to treat knee pathologies and to prevent injuries. Although they have received much attention for the study of knee injury, the effects of wedges on ankle joint biomechanics are not well understood. This study sought to evaluate the immediate effects of lateral and medial wedges on knee and ankle internal joint loading and center of pressure (CoP) in men during walking.
Twenty-one healthy men walked at 1.4 m/sec in five footwear conditions: neutral, 6° (LW6) and 9° (LW9) lateral wedges, and 6° (MW6) and 9° (MW9) medial wedges. Peak internal knee abduction moments and angular impulses, internal ankle inversion moments and angular impulses, and mediolateral CoP were analyzed. Analysis of variance with post hoc analysis and Pearson correlations were performed to detect differences between conditions.
No differences in internal knee joint loading were found between neutral and any of the wedge conditions. However, as the wedge angle increased from medial to lateral, the internal ankle inversion moment (LW6: P = .020; LW9: P < .001; MW6: P = .046; MW9: P < .001) and angular impulse (LW9: P = .012) increased, and the CoP shifted laterally (LW9: P < .001) and medially (MW9: P < .001) compared with the neutral condition.
Neither lateral nor medial wedges were effective in altering internal knee joint loading during walking. However, the greater internal ankle inversion moment and angular impulse observed with lateral wedges could lead to a higher risk of ankle injury. Thus, caution should be taken when lateral wedges need to be prescribed.
楔形鞋垫已被用于治疗膝关节病变和预防损伤。尽管它们在膝关节损伤研究中受到了广泛关注,但楔形鞋垫对踝关节生物力学的影响尚未得到充分了解。本研究旨在评估外侧和内侧楔形鞋垫对男性行走时膝关节和踝关节内部关节负荷以及压力中心(CoP)的即时影响。
21名健康男性在五种鞋类条件下以1.4米/秒的速度行走:中性、6°(LW6)和9°(LW9)外侧楔形鞋垫,以及6°(MW6)和9°(MW9)内侧楔形鞋垫。分析了膝关节内收峰值力矩和角冲量、踝关节内翻峰值力矩和角冲量以及内外侧压力中心。进行方差分析及事后分析和皮尔逊相关性分析以检测不同条件之间的差异。
中性条件与任何楔形鞋垫条件之间在膝关节内部关节负荷方面均未发现差异。然而,随着楔形角度从内侧到外侧增加,踝关节内翻峰值力矩(LW6:P = 0.020;LW9:P < 0.001;MW6:P = 0.046;MW9:P < 0.001)和角冲量(LW9:P = 0.012)增加,并且与中性条件相比,压力中心向外侧(LW9:P < 0.001)和内侧(MW9:P < 0.001)移动。
外侧和内侧楔形鞋垫在行走过程中均未有效改变膝关节内部关节负荷。然而,外侧楔形鞋垫观察到的更大的踝关节内翻峰值力矩和角冲量可能导致更高的踝关节损伤风险。因此,在需要开具外侧楔形鞋垫处方时应谨慎。