Suppr超能文献

对面部和非面部刺激敏感的视觉皮层中的位置选择性:一项功能磁共振成像研究。

Position selectivity in face-sensitive visual cortex to facial and nonfacial stimuli: an fMRI study.

作者信息

Nichols David F, Betts Lisa R, Wilson Hugh R

机构信息

Department of Psychology Roanoke College Salem VA USA.

Centre for Vision Research York University Toronto ON Canada.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2016 Sep 4;6(11):e00542. doi: 10.1002/brb3.542. eCollection 2016 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence for position sensitivity in object-selective visual areas has been building. On one hand, most of the relevant studies have utilized stimuli for which the areas are optimally selective and examine small sections of cortex. On the other hand, visual field maps established with nonspecific stimuli have been found in increasingly large areas of visual cortex, though generally not in areas primarily responsive to faces.

METHODS

fMRI was used to study the position sensitivity of the occipital face area (OFA) and the fusiform face area (FFA) to both standard rotating wedge retinotopic mapping stimuli and quadrant presentations of synthetic facial stimuli. Analysis methods utilized were both typical, that is, mean univariate BOLD signals and multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA), and novel, that is, distribution of voxels to pattern classifiers and use of responses to nonfacial retinotopic mapping stimuli to classify responses to facial stimuli.

RESULTS

Polar angle sensitivity was exhibited to standard retinotopic mapping stimuli with a stronger contralateral bias in OFA than in FFA, a stronger bias toward the vertical meridian in FFA than in OFA, and a bias across both areas toward the inferior visual field. Contralateral hemispheric lateralization of both areas was again shown using synthetic face stimuli based on univariate BOLD signals, MVPA, and the biased contribution of voxels toward multivariate classifiers discriminating the contralateral visual field. Classifiers based on polar angle responsivity were used to classify the patterns of activation above chance levels to face stimuli in the OFA but not in the FFA.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the OFA and FFA exhibit quadrant sensitivity to face stimuli, though the OFA exhibits greater position responsivity across stimuli than the FFA and includes overlap in the response pattern to the disparate stimulus types. Such biases are consistent with varying position sensitivity along different surfaces of occipito-temporal cortex.

摘要

背景

关于物体选择性视觉区域中位置敏感性的证据不断积累。一方面,大多数相关研究使用的是这些区域具有最佳选择性的刺激,并检查皮质的小区域。另一方面,在视觉皮质的越来越大的区域中发现了用非特异性刺激建立的视野图,不过通常不在主要对面部作出反应的区域。

方法

功能磁共振成像(fMRI)用于研究枕颞面部区域(OFA)和梭状回面部区域(FFA)对标准旋转楔形视网膜拓扑映射刺激以及合成面部刺激的象限呈现的位置敏感性。所采用的分析方法既有典型的,即平均单变量血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号和多体素模式分析(MVPA),也有新颖的,即体素向模式分类器的分布以及使用对非面部视网膜拓扑映射刺激的反应来对面部刺激的反应进行分类。

结果

对标准视网膜拓扑映射刺激表现出极角敏感性,OFA中对侧偏倚比FFA更强,FFA中朝向垂直子午线的偏倚比OFA更强,并且两个区域都存在向下视野的偏倚。基于单变量BOLD信号、MVPA以及体素对区分对侧视野的多变量分类器的有偏贡献,再次使用合成面部刺激显示了两个区域的对侧半球偏侧化。基于极角反应性的分类器用于将OFA中高于机遇水平的激活模式分类为对面部刺激的反应,但FFA中未分类。

结论

OFA和FFA对面部刺激均表现出象限敏感性,尽管OFA在不同刺激中表现出比FFA更大的位置反应性,并且在对不同刺激类型的反应模式中存在重叠。这种偏倚与枕颞皮质不同表面上变化的位置敏感性一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1e4/5102641/dc63aff51d37/BRB3-6-e00542-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验