Lally John, Gaughran Fiona, Timms Philip, Curran Sarah R
Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; National Psychosis Service.
Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; National Psychosis Service.
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2016 Nov 7;9:117-129. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S115741. eCollection 2016.
Up to 30% of people with schizophrenia do not respond to two (or more) trials of dopaminergic antipsychotics. They are said to have treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Clozapine is still the only effective treatment for TRS, although it is underused in clinical practice. Initial use is delayed, it can be hard for patients to tolerate, and clinicians can be uncertain as to when to use it. What if, at the start of treatment, we could identify those patients likely to respond to clozapine - and those likely to suffer adverse effects? It is likely that clinicians would feel less inhibited about using it, allowing clozapine to be used earlier and more appropriately. Genetic testing holds out the tantalizing possibility of being able to do just this, and hence the vital importance of pharmacogenomic studies. These can potentially identify genetic markers for both tolerance of and vulnerability to clozapine. We aim to summarize progress so far, possible clinical applications, limitations to the evidence, and problems in applying these findings to the management of TRS. Pharmacogenomic studies of clozapine response and tolerability have produced conflicting results. These are due, at least in part, to significant differences in the patient groups studied. The use of clinical pharmacogenomic testing - to personalize clozapine treatment and identify patients at high risk of treatment failure or of adverse events - has moved closer over the last 20 years. However, to develop such testing that could be used clinically will require larger, multicenter, prospective studies.
高达30%的精神分裂症患者对两种(或更多种)多巴胺能抗精神病药物治疗无效。他们被认为患有难治性精神分裂症(TRS)。氯氮平仍然是TRS的唯一有效治疗方法,尽管在临床实践中使用不足。初始使用被延迟,患者可能难以耐受,临床医生对于何时使用也可能不确定。如果在治疗开始时,我们就能识别出那些可能对氯氮平有反应的患者以及那些可能出现不良反应的患者呢?临床医生可能会在使用氯氮平时感到顾虑减少,从而能更早、更适当地使用氯氮平。基因检测提供了实现这一目标的诱人可能性,因此药物基因组学研究至关重要。这些研究有可能识别出氯氮平耐受性和易感性的基因标记。我们旨在总结目前的进展、可能的临床应用、证据的局限性以及将这些发现应用于TRS管理中存在的问题。关于氯氮平反应和耐受性的药物基因组学研究结果相互矛盾。这些矛盾至少部分归因于所研究患者群体的显著差异。在过去20年里,利用临床药物基因组学检测来个性化氯氮平治疗并识别治疗失败或出现不良事件高风险患者的做法已越来越接近现实。然而,要开发出可用于临床的此类检测,还需要更大规模、多中心的前瞻性研究。