Junne Florian, Ziser Katrin, Mander Johannes, Martus Peter, Denzer Christian, Reinehr Thomas, Wabitsch Martin, Wiegand Susanna, Renner Tobias, Giel Katrin E, Teufel Martin, Zipfel Stephan, Ehehalt Stefan
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Centre for Psychological Psychotherapy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 17;6(11):e012711. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012711.
High prevalence rates of childhood obesity urgently call for improved effectiveness of intervention programmes for affected children and their families. One promising attempt can be seen in tailoring interventions according to the motivational stages of parents as 'agents of change' for their children. Evidence from other behavioural contexts (eg, addiction) clearly shows the superiority of motivational-stage dependent tailored (behavioural) interventions. For the time-efficient assessment of motivational stages of change, this study aims to develop and psychometrically validate a 'Parent Perspective Version' of the existing University of Rhode Island Change Assessment-Short, an instrument assessing the motivational stages based on the theoretical fundamentals of the Transtheoretical Model of Psychotherapy.
In a multistep Delphi procedure, involving experts from the study context, the original items of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment-Short Questionnaire will be transformed from the 'self-perspective' ('I am having a problem') to the parent perspective ('my child is having a problem'). Following item adaptation, the new version of the questionnaire will be psychometrically validated in a cohort of N=300 parents with overweight or obese children. Parents will be recruited within a multicentre and multisite approach involving private paediatric practices, specialised outpatient clinics as well as inpatient and rehabilitation sites. Analyses will include confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistencies (reliability) as well as convergent and criterion validity. Convergent validity will be analysed using subscales of the HAKEMP-90 Questionnaire, an instrument which has been shown to differentiate between 'state' and 'action' orientation of individuals.
This study has been granted ethics committee approval by the University of Tuebingen (number 644/2014BO2). The results of this study will be released to the participating study centres and will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.
VfD_PURICA-S_15_003607.
儿童肥胖的高患病率迫切需要提高针对受影响儿童及其家庭的干预项目的有效性。一种有前景的尝试是根据父母作为孩子“改变推动者”的动机阶段来定制干预措施。来自其他行为背景(如成瘾)的证据清楚地表明了基于动机阶段的定制(行为)干预措施的优越性。为了高效评估改变的动机阶段,本研究旨在开发并从心理测量学角度验证现有罗德岛大学改变评估简表的“家长视角版本”,该工具基于心理治疗的跨理论模型的理论基础来评估动机阶段。
在一个多步骤的德尔菲程序中,将邀请来自研究背景的专家,把罗德岛大学改变评估简表问卷的原始项目从“自我视角”(“我有问题”)转变为家长视角(“我的孩子有问题”)。在项目改编之后,新版本的问卷将在一个由300名有超重或肥胖孩子的家长组成的队列中进行心理测量学验证。将通过多中心、多地点的方式招募家长,涉及私立儿科诊所、专科门诊以及住院和康复机构。分析将包括验证性因素分析、内部一致性(信度)以及收敛效度和效标效度。将使用HAKEMP - 90问卷的子量表来分析收敛效度,该工具已被证明能够区分个体的“状态”和“行动”取向。
本研究已获得图宾根大学伦理委员会的批准(编号644/2014BO2)。本研究的结果将发布给参与研究的中心,并将提交给同行评审期刊以及在国际会议上展示。
VfD_PURICA - S_15_003607