Suppr超能文献

亚叶酸钙/5-氟尿嘧啶联合或不联合奥沙利铂(LV5FU2对比FOLFOX)用于根治性切除的、淋巴结阳性食管鳞状细胞癌的随机II期研究。

A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

作者信息

Lim Sung Hee, Shim Young Mog, Park Se Hoon, Kim Hong Kwan, Choi Young Soo, Ahn Myung-Ju, Park Keunchil, Zo Jae Ill, Sun Jong-Mu

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University of College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;49(3):816-823. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.417. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The optimal perioperative treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (LV5FU2) and LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination chemotherapies administered adjuvantly for curatively-resected, node-positive ESCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with pathologically node-positive esophageal cancer after curative R0 resection were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX biweekly for up to eight cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2015, 62 patients were randomized into the two treatment groups (32 in the LV5FU2 arm and 30 in the FOLFOX arm). The median age was 60 years and both groups had similar pathologic characteristics in tumor, nodal status, and location. Treatment completion rates were similarly high in both groups. The DFS rate at 12 months was 67% in the LV5FU2 group and 63% in the FOLFOX group with a hazard ratio of 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 2.62). After a median follow-up period of 27 months, the median DFS was 29.6 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 54.2) in the LV5FU2 arm and 16.8 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 26.1) in the FOLFOX arm (p=0.428), respectively, while the median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more frequent in patients in the FOLFOX arm than the LV5FU2 arm (20.0% vs. 3.1%).

CONCLUSION

The addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) did not lead to better efficacy compared to LV5FU2 chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting in node-positive ESCC patients.

摘要

目的

可切除食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的最佳围手术期治疗仍存在争议。我们评估了亚叶酸钙和5-氟尿嘧啶(LV5FU2)以及LV5FU2联合奥沙利铂(FOLFOX)辅助化疗对根治性切除的淋巴结阳性ESCC的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

纳入根治性R0切除术后病理淋巴结阳性的食管癌患者,随机分为两组,每两周接受一次LV5FU2或FOLFOX治疗,共八个周期。主要终点为无病生存期(DFS)。

结果

2011年至2015年期间,62例患者被随机分为两个治疗组(LV5FU2组32例,FOLFOX组30例)。中位年龄为60岁,两组在肿瘤、淋巴结状态和位置的病理特征相似。两组的治疗完成率同样高。LV5FU2组12个月时的DFS率为67%,FOLFOX组为63%,风险比为1.3(95%置信区间[CI],0.66至2.62)。中位随访27个月后,LV5FU2组的中位DFS为29.6个月(95%CI,4.9至54.2),FOLFOX组为16.8个月(95%CI,7.5至26.1)(p=0.428),而两组的中位总生存期均未达到。FOLFOX组3/4级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率高于LV5FU2组(20.0%对3.1%)。

结论

在淋巴结阳性ESCC患者的辅助治疗中,与LV5FU2化疗相比,添加奥沙利铂(FOLFOX)并未带来更好的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a6c/5512359/1465fc994f3c/crt-2016-417f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验