Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 0B1, Canada.
African Centre for DNA Barcoding, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ecology. 2016 Sep;97(9):2212-2222. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1507.
Recent studies have supported a link between phylogenetic diversity and various ecological properties including ecosystem function. However, such studies typically assume that phylogenetic branches of equivalent length are more or less interchangeable. Here we suggest that there is a need to consider not only branch lengths but also their placement on the phylogeny. We demonstrate how two common indices of network centrality can be used to describe the evolutionary distinctiveness of network elements (nodes and branches) on a phylogeny. If phylogenetic diversity enhances ecosystem function via complementarity and the representation of functional diversity, we would predict a correlation between evolutionary distinctiveness of network elements and their contribution to ecosystem process. In contrast, if one or a few evolutionary innovations play key roles in ecosystem function, the relationship between evolutionary distinctiveness and functional contribution may be weak or absent. We illustrate how network elements associated with high functional contribution can be identified from regressions between phylogenetic diversity and productivity using a well-known empirical data set on plant productivity from the Cedar Creek Long-Term Ecological Research. We find no association between evolutionary distinctiveness and ecosystem functioning, but we are able to identify phylogenetic elements associated with species of known high functional contribution within the Fabaceae. Our perspective provides a useful guide in the search for ecological traits linking diversity and ecosystem function, and suggests a more nuanced consideration of phylogenetic diversity is required in the conservation and biodiversity-ecosystem-function literature.
最近的研究支持了系统发育多样性与包括生态系统功能在内的各种生态特性之间的联系。然而,此类研究通常假设具有相等长度的系统发育分支或多或少是可互换的。在这里,我们建议不仅需要考虑分支长度,还需要考虑它们在系统发育树上的位置。我们展示了如何使用两种常见的网络中心性指标来描述系统发育树上网络元素(节点和分支)的进化独特性。如果系统发育多样性通过互补性和功能多样性的表示来增强生态系统功能,我们预计网络元素的进化独特性与其对生态系统过程的贡献之间会存在相关性。相反,如果一个或几个进化创新在生态系统功能中起着关键作用,那么进化独特性和功能贡献之间的关系可能较弱或不存在。我们通过使用著名的 Cedar Creek 长期生态研究中关于植物生产力的实证数据集,从系统发育多样性与生产力之间的回归中说明了如何识别与高功能贡献相关的网络元素。我们没有发现进化独特性与生态系统功能之间存在关联,但我们能够识别与豆科中已知具有高功能贡献的物种相关的系统发育元素。我们的观点为寻找将多样性与生态系统功能联系起来的生态特征提供了有用的指导,并表明在保护和生物多样性-生态系统功能文献中,需要更细致地考虑系统发育多样性。