Suppr超能文献

工作场所环境干预改变员工饮食行为的系统评价。

Environmental interventions for altering eating behaviours of employees in the workplace: a systematic review.

机构信息

Health Psychology, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

出版信息

Obes Rev. 2017 Feb;18(2):214-226. doi: 10.1111/obr.12470. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

Abstract

Environmental, or 'choice-architecture', interventions aim to change behaviour by changing properties/contents of the environment and are commonly used in the workplace to promote healthy behaviours in employees. The present review aimed to evaluate and synthesize the evidence surrounding the effectiveness of environmental interventions targeting eating behaviour in the workplace. A systematic search identified 8157 articles, of which 22 were included in the current review. All included studies were coded according to risk of bias and reporting quality and were classified according to the emergent typology of choice-architecture interventions. More than half of included studies (13/22) reported significant changes in primary measures of eating behaviour (increased fruit/veg consumption, increased sales of healthy options and reduction in calories purchased). However, only one study produced a small significant improvement in weight/body mass index. Many studies had a high or unknown risk of bias; reporting of interventions was suboptimal; and the only trial to measure compensatory behaviours found that intervention participants who ate less during the intervention ate more out with the workplace later in the day. Hence, we conclude that more rigorous, well-reported studies that account for compensatory behaviours are needed to fully understand the impact of environmental interventions on diet and importantly on weight/body mass index outcomes.

摘要

环境(或“选择架构”)干预旨在通过改变环境的属性/内容来改变行为,常用于工作场所,以促进员工的健康行为。本综述旨在评估和综合围绕针对工作场所饮食行为的环境干预措施的有效性的证据。系统搜索确定了 8157 篇文章,其中 22 篇被纳入本综述。所有纳入的研究均根据偏倚风险和报告质量进行编码,并根据新兴的选择架构干预分类进行分类。超过一半的纳入研究(13/22)报告了饮食行为的主要措施的显著变化(增加水果/蔬菜的消费,增加健康选择的销售和减少购买的卡路里)。然而,只有一项研究在体重/身体质量指数方面产生了较小的显著改善。许多研究存在高或未知的偏倚风险;干预措施的报告不理想;并且唯一一项测量补偿行为的试验发现,在干预期间吃得较少的干预参与者在当天晚些时候在工作场所外吃得更多。因此,我们得出结论,需要更严格、报告良好的研究来充分了解环境干预措施对饮食的影响,更重要的是对体重/身体质量指数结果的影响,这些研究需要考虑到补偿行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验