Han Kihye, Trinkoff Alison M, Storr Carla L, Lerner Nancy, Yang Bo Kyum
Lambda Alpha-at-Large, Assistant Professor, Chung-Ang University Red Cross College of Nursing, Seoul, South Korea.
Pi, Professor, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Jan;49(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12262. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
Though more people in the United States currently reside in assisted living facilities (ALFs) than nursing homes, little is known about ALF admission policies, resident care needs, and staffing characteristics. We therefore conducted this study using a nationwide sample of ALFs to examine these factors, along with comparison of ALFs by size.
Cross-sectional secondary data analysis using data from the 2010 National Survey of Residential Care Facilities.
Measures included nine admission policy items, seven items on the proportion of residents with selected conditions or care needs, and six items on staffing characteristics (e.g., access to licensed nurse, aide training). Facilities (n = 2,301) were divided into three categories by size: small, 4 to 10 beds; medium, 11 to 25 beds; and large, 26 or more beds. Analyses took complex sampling design effects into account to project national U.S. estimates.
More than half of ALFs admitted residents with considerable healthcare needs and served populations that required nursing care, such as for transfers, medications, and eating or dressing. Staffing was largely composed of patient care aides, and fewer than half of ALFs had licensed care provider (registered nurse, licensed practical nurse) hours. Smaller facilities tended to have more inclusive admission policies and residents with more complex care needs (more mobility, eating and medication assistance required, short-term memory issues, p < .01) and less access to licensed nurses than larger ALFs (p < .01).
This study suggests ALFs are caring for and admitting residents with considerable care needs, indicating potential overlap with nursing home populations. Despite this finding, ALF regulations lag far behind those in effect for nursing homes. In addition, measurement of care outcomes is critically needed to ensure appropriate ALF care quality.
As more people choose ALFs, outcome measures for ALFs, which are now unavailable, should be developed to allow for oversight and monitoring of care quality.
尽管目前美国居住在辅助生活设施(ALF)中的人数多于养老院,但对于ALF的入院政策、居民护理需求和人员配置特点却知之甚少。因此,我们使用全国范围内的ALF样本进行了这项研究,以考察这些因素,并按规模对ALF进行比较。
使用2010年全国住宅护理设施调查的数据进行横断面二次数据分析。
测量指标包括9项入院政策项目、7项关于有特定状况或护理需求居民比例的项目以及6项人员配置特点项目(如获得持牌护士护理、护工培训情况)。设施(n = 2301)按规模分为三类:小型,4至10张床位;中型,11至25张床位;大型,26张及以上床位。分析考虑了复杂抽样设计效应,以推算美国全国的估计数。
超过半数的ALF接收有大量医疗需求的居民,并服务于需要护理的人群,如转运、用药以及进食或穿衣等方面。人员配置主要由患者护理护工组成,不到半数的ALF有持牌护理人员(注册护士、执业护士)的工作时长。较小的设施往往有更具包容性的入院政策,居民有更复杂的护理需求(更多行动不便、需要进食和用药协助、有短期记忆问题,p < 0.01),并且与大型ALF相比,获得持牌护士护理的机会更少(p < 0.01)。
本研究表明,ALF正在照料并接收有大量护理需求的居民,这表明其与养老院人群可能存在重叠。尽管有这一发现,但ALF的相关规定远远落后于适用于养老院的规定。此外,迫切需要对护理结果进行测量,以确保ALF有适当的护理质量。
随着越来越多的人选择ALF,应制定目前尚不存在的ALF结果测量指标,以便对护理质量进行监督和监测。