• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计图形以传达风险:理解图形格式的选择如何影响决策。

Designing Graphs to Communicate Risks: Understanding How the Choice of Graphical Format Influences Decision Making.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, Leeds, England.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2017 Apr;37(4):612-628. doi: 10.1111/risa.12660. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1111/risa.12660
PMID:27862121
Abstract

Previous research suggests that the choice of graphical format for communicating risk information affects both understanding of the risk magnitude and the likelihood of acting to decrease risk. However, the mechanisms through which these effects work are poorly understood. To explore these mechanisms using a real-world scenario, we examined the relative impact of two graphical displays for depicting the risk of exposure to unexploded ammunition during potential land redevelopment. One display depicted only the foreground information graphically (a bar graph of the number of people harmed), and a second depicted the foreground and background graphically (a stacked bar graph representing both the number harmed and at risk). We presented 296 participants with either the foreground-only or the foreground and background graphical display and measured a broad set of outcome variables, examining (1) the graphical display effect on each of the outcome measures and (2) the pathways by which any display effects work to influence decision making. We found that the foreground-only graphical display increased perceived likelihood and experienced fear, which produced greater worry, which in turn increased risk aversion. In addition, a positive evaluation of the communication materials increased support for policies related to land redevelopment, whether those policies were risk taking or risk mitigating. Finally, the foreground-only graphical display decreased understanding of the risk magnitude, showing that approaches to accomplish one risk communication goal (promoting risk-averse decisions) may do so at the expense of another goal (increasing understanding).

摘要

先前的研究表明,用于传达风险信息的图形格式的选择会影响对风险幅度的理解和降低风险的可能性。然而,这些效果的作用机制还知之甚少。为了利用真实场景来探索这些机制,我们研究了两种用于描述潜在土地再开发过程中暴露于未爆炸弹药风险的图形显示方式的相对影响。一种显示方式仅以图形方式显示前景信息(伤害人数的条形图),另一种显示方式以图形方式显示前景和背景(代表伤害人数和风险的堆叠条形图)。我们向 296 名参与者展示了仅前景或前景和背景的图形显示,并测量了一系列广泛的结果变量,考察了(1)图形显示对每个结果变量的影响,以及(2)任何显示效果影响决策的途径。我们发现,仅前景的图形显示增加了感知到的可能性和经历的恐惧,从而导致更多的担忧,进而增加了风险规避。此外,对沟通材料的积极评价增加了对与土地再开发相关的政策的支持,无论这些政策是冒险还是减轻风险。最后,仅前景的图形显示降低了对风险幅度的理解,表明实现一个风险沟通目标(促进风险规避决策)的方法可能会以牺牲另一个目标(增加理解)为代价。

相似文献

1
Designing Graphs to Communicate Risks: Understanding How the Choice of Graphical Format Influences Decision Making.设计图形以传达风险:理解图形格式的选择如何影响决策。
Risk Anal. 2017 Apr;37(4):612-628. doi: 10.1111/risa.12660. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
2
Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes.数字显示与仅前景图标显示对风险程度理解的影响。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(10):1230-41. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018594. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
3
Designing Graphs that Promote Both Risk Understanding and Behavior Change.设计既能促进风险理解又能促进行为改变的图形。
Risk Anal. 2018 May;38(5):929-946. doi: 10.1111/risa.12895. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
4
Probability Size Matters: The Effect of Foreground-Only versus Foreground+Background Graphs on Risk Aversion Diminishes with Larger Probabilities.概率大小很重要:仅前景与前景+背景图形对风险规避的影响随概率增大而减弱。
Risk Anal. 2020 Apr;40(4):771-788. doi: 10.1111/risa.13431. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Communicating quantitative information about unexploded ordnance risks to the public.向公众传达关于未爆炸弹药风险的定量信息。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 May 7;47(9):4004-13. doi: 10.1021/es305254j. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
6
The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.不同图形和数字似然性格式对似然性感知和选择的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):487-500. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15576487. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
7
The visual communication of risk.风险的视觉传达。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999(25):149-63. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024191.
8
Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.传达风险信息:图形显示格式对定量信息感知的影响——准确性、理解与偏好
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
9
How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.人们如何处理不同形式的统计信息?对认知努力、表示不一致和个体差异的洞察。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):803-820. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231202505. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
10
Bar and line graph comprehension: an interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes.柱状图和折线图理解:自上而下与自下而上过程的相互作用。
Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;3(3):560-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01066.x. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
How Difference Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 2: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.不同任务如何受到概率格式的影响,第2部分:一项使数字有意义的系统评价。
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241310242. doi: 10.1177/23814683241310242. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
2
Scope, Methods, and Overview Findings for the Making Numbers Meaningful Evidence Review of Communicating Probabilities in Health: A Systematic Review.《让数字有意义:健康领域概率沟通的循证综述》的范围、方法及概述性研究结果:一项系统综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255334. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255334. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
3
How Point (Single-Probability) Tasks Are Affected by Probability Format, Part 2: A Making Numbers Meaningful Systematic Review.
点(单概率)任务如何受到概率格式的影响,第二部分:一项使数字有意义的系统综述。
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 24;10(1):23814683241255337. doi: 10.1177/23814683241255337. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
4
Visualizing machine learning-based predictions of postpartum depression risk for lay audiences.为非专业人士直观呈现基于机器学习的产后抑郁风险预测。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Jan 18;31(2):289-297. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad198.
5
Policies to influence perceptions about COVID-19 risk: The case of maps.影响对新冠病毒风险认知的政策:以地图为例。
Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 18;8(11):eabm5106. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm5106.
6
Understanding and Communicating Risk: Assessing Both Relative and Absolute Risk Is Absolutely Necessary.理解与沟通风险:评估相对风险和绝对风险都是绝对必要的。
JID Innov. 2022 Jan 15;2(2):100097. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2022.100097. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Visual analogies, not graphs, increase patients' comprehension of changes in their health status.直观类比,而非图表,能提高患者对自身健康状况变化的理解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):677-689. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz217.