Kobayashi Hiroki, Haketa Akira, Ueno Takahiro, Ikeda Yukihiro, Hatanaka Yoshinari, Tanaka Sho, Otsuka Hiromasa, Abe Masanori, Fukuda Noboru, Soma Masayoshi
Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017 Apr;86(4):467-472. doi: 10.1111/cen.13278. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
The only reliable method for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA) is adrenal venous sampling (AVS), which is costly and time-consuming. Considering the limited availability of AVS, it would be helpful to obtain information on the diagnosis of bilateral hyperaldosteronism (BHA) from routine tests. We aimed to establish new, simple criteria for outpatients to diagnose BHA from PA before AVS.
We retrospectively analysed 82 patients who were diagnosed with PA and underwent AVS. Thirty-seven patients were diagnosed with unilateral hyperaldosteronism (UHA), and 36 with BHA and nine were undetermined. Among the variables that were significantly different between UHA and BHA in the univariate analysis, we chose three variables to be included in multivariate logistic regression models and constructed a subtype prediction score.
The subtype prediction score was calculated as follows: 3 points for no adrenal nodules on computed tomography imaging, 2 for serum potassium of ≥3·5 mmol/l and 2 for aldosterone-to-renin ratio of <490 after a captopril challenge test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the ability to discriminate BHA from UHA showed that a score of 7 points had 50% sensitivity and 100% specificity and a score of 5 points had 67% sensitivity and 94% specificity (area under the curve: 0·922; 95% CI: 0·863-0·980).
Our new, simple criteria specifically distinguished BHA from UHA in the outpatient setting before AVS. Furthermore, not only endocrinologists but also general internists can use this convenient, safe scoring system.
原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)亚型分类的唯一可靠方法是肾上腺静脉采样(AVS),该方法成本高且耗时。鉴于AVS的可及性有限,从常规检查中获取双侧醛固酮增多症(BHA)的诊断信息会有所帮助。我们旨在建立新的、简单的标准,以便门诊患者在进行AVS之前从PA中诊断出BHA。
我们回顾性分析了82例被诊断为PA并接受AVS的患者。37例被诊断为单侧醛固酮增多症(UHA),36例为BHA,9例未确定。在单因素分析中UHA和BHA之间有显著差异的变量中,我们选择了三个变量纳入多因素逻辑回归模型并构建了一个亚型预测评分。
亚型预测评分计算如下:计算机断层扫描成像无肾上腺结节得3分,血清钾≥3.5 mmol/l得2分,卡托普利激发试验后醛固酮与肾素比值<490得2分。用于区分BHA和UHA能力的受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,7分的评分灵敏度为50%,特异性为100%,5分的评分灵敏度为67%,特异性为94%(曲线下面积:0.922;95%可信区间:0.863 - 0.980)。
我们新的、简单的标准在门诊患者进行AVS之前能特异性地将BHA与UHA区分开来。此外,不仅内分泌科医生,普通内科医生也可以使用这个方便、安全的评分系统。