Mahmoud Heba Talat, Santoro Giuseppe, Gaio Gianpiero, D'Aiello Fabio Angelo, Capogrosso Cristina, Palladino Maria Teresa, Russo Maria Giovanna
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, A.O.R.N. "Ospedali dei Colli", 2nd University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):1045-1050. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26860. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
This study aimed to report a large, single-center experience of percutaneous arterial duct (AD) closure using Amplatzer Duct Occluder II Additional Sizes device (ADO II-AS)(St. Jude Medical Corp, St. Paul, MN, USA).
Transcatheter closure of AD remains challenging in low body weight patients and those who have a persisting shunt following a previous attempt at interventional closure. Recent technical advances in device design may address these issues.
From May 2011 to April 2016, 109 patients underwent attempted percutaneous closure of AD with ADO II-AS at our Institution. Mean age and weight were 4.8 ± 8.1 years (range 0-48) and 21.4 ± 20.6 kg (range 3-93), respectively. Fifteen patients (13.8%) were ≤6 kg (age 3.5 ± 2.0 months; weight 4.7 ± 1.1 kg). Arterial duct morphology was type A in 62 (57%), type B in 1 (1%), type C in 32 (29%), type D in 7 (6%) and type E in 6 patients (6%), respectively. Arterial approach was used to negotiate and deploy the occluding device in 103 patients (94.5%).
AD diameter was 2.2 ± 0.6 (range 1.5-4.5) resulting in QP/QS of 1.9 ± 0.7 (range 1-3.3). Mean pulmonary artery pressure and PA/aortic pressure ratio were 19.3 ± 5.0 mm Hg (range 12-38) and 0.34 ± 0.14 (range 0.14-0.95), respectively. Successful device deployment was achieved in 107 patients (98.2%). Neither procedural morbidity nor mortality was recorded. Immediate, 24h and mid-term (30 ± 17 months) complete occlusion was recorded in 71%, 98.1%, and 100% of patients, respectively.
In our experience, trans-catheter closure of AD of different sizes and morphologies using ADO II-AS is highly feasible, safe and effective also in challenging anatomic/clinical settings. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
本研究旨在报告使用美国明尼苏达州圣保罗市圣犹达医疗公司生产的Amplatzer动脉导管封堵器II额外尺寸装置(ADO II - AS)进行经皮动脉导管(AD)封堵的大型单中心经验。
对于低体重患者以及先前介入封堵尝试后仍存在分流的患者,经导管封堵AD仍然具有挑战性。装置设计方面的最新技术进展可能解决这些问题。
2011年5月至2016年4月,我院109例患者尝试使用ADO II - AS进行经皮AD封堵。平均年龄和体重分别为4.8±8.1岁(范围0 - 48岁)和21.4±20.6 kg(范围3 - 93 kg)。15例患者(13.8%)体重≤6 kg(年龄3.5±2.0个月;体重4.7±1.1 kg)。动脉导管形态分别为A型62例(57%)、B型1例(1%)、C型32例(29%)、D型7例(6%)和E型6例(6%)。103例患者(94.5%)采用动脉途径操作并植入封堵装置。
AD直径为2.2±0.6(范围1.5 - 4.5),导致肺循环血流量与体循环血流量比值(QP/QS)为1.9±0.7(范围1 - 3.3)。平均肺动脉压和肺动脉与主动脉压力比值分别为19.3±5.0 mmHg(范围12 - 38)和0.34±0.14(范围0.14 - 0.95)。107例患者(98.2%)成功植入装置。未记录到手术相关的发病率和死亡率。分别有71%、98.1%和100%的患者在即刻、24小时和中期(30±17个月)实现完全封堵。
根据我们的经验,使用ADO II - AS对不同大小和形态的AD进行经导管封堵在具有挑战性的解剖/临床情况下也是高度可行、安全且有效的。© 2016威利期刊公司。