Suppr超能文献

平面和断层γ闪烁扫描术测量吸入气雾剂渗透指数的比较。

Comparisons of planar and tomographic gamma scintigraphy to measure the penetration index of inhaled aerosols.

作者信息

Phipps P R, Gonda I, Bailey D L, Borham P, Bautovich G, Anderson S D

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Jun;139(6):1516-23. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/139.6.1516.

Abstract

The quantitative measurement of regional aerosol deposition in human lungs using two-dimensional (2D) gamma scintigraphy has proven to be useful in therapeutic and diagnostic aerosol studies. The penetration index (PI) has been defined as the ratio of activity in a peripheral lung zone to a central lung zone, but the ability to discriminate between aerosol deposition in the large airways and lung parenchyma is reduced by the fact that the latter overlies the former in the central zone. To overcome this, we used a three-dimensional (3D) technique. Seven healthy subjects inhaled isotonic saline aerosols containing 99mTc-DTPA on two occasions. The droplets had a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of either 2.6 or 5.5 microns (with geometric standard deviations [sigma g] of 1.4 and 1.7, respectively). Transmission tomography was performed on each subject to delineate lung boundaries in 2D and 3D. After inhalation, anterior (A) and posterior (P) images were collected and a tomographic study performed. Mid-lung slices were taken from coronal (CC) and transverse (TC) sections. PI was calculated on the 2D images (AP and P) and the 3D slices (CC and TC) using exactly defined regions. The PI values were smaller for the large droplet aerosol (5.5 microns) in all subjects and methods. The relative differences in PI between large and small (2.6 microns) droplet studies (d values) were greater and less variable for the 3D methods (TC, 56.5 +/- 11.4% and CC, 52.4 +/- 12.3%) compared to the 2D methods (P, 25.4 +/- 17.1% and AP, 38.3 +/- 15%; p less than 0.005). We found the 3D methods to be more sensitive for discriminating between aerosol deposition in large and small airways than were the conventional 2D methods.

摘要

利用二维(2D)γ闪烁扫描法定量测量人体肺部区域气溶胶沉积,已被证明在气溶胶治疗和诊断研究中很有用。穿透指数(PI)被定义为外周肺区与中央肺区活性之比,但由于在中央区后者覆盖前者,区分大气道和气溶胶在肺实质中的沉积的能力有所降低。为克服这一问题,我们采用了三维(3D)技术。7名健康受试者分两次吸入含99mTc-DTPA的等渗盐雾气溶胶。液滴的质量中值空气动力学直径(MMAD)分别为2.6或5.5微米(几何标准差[σg]分别为1.4和1.7)。对每位受试者进行透射断层扫描,以二维和三维方式描绘肺边界。吸入后,采集前后位(A)和后前位(P)图像并进行断层扫描研究。从冠状面(CC)和横断面(TC)切片获取肺中部切片。使用精确定义的区域在二维图像(AP和P)和三维切片(CC和TC)上计算PI。在所有受试者和方法中,大液滴气溶胶(5.5微米)的PI值较小。与二维方法(P,25.4 +/- 17.1%和AP,38.3 +/- 15%;p < 0.005)相比,三维方法(TC,56.5 +/- 11.4%和CC,52.4 +/- 12.3%)在大小(2.6微米)液滴研究之间PI的相对差异(d值)更大且变异性更小。我们发现,与传统二维方法相比,三维方法在区分大气道和小气道中的气溶胶沉积方面更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验