Bodini Giorgia, Giannini Edoardo G, De Maria Costanza, Dulbecco Pietro, Furnari Manuele, Marabotto Elisa, Savarino Vincenzo, Savarino Edoardo
Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Feb;49(2):175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
The Lémann Index (LI) was developed to assess the cumulative structural damage of the intestinal tract in patients with Crohn's Disease (CD) independently of clinical and biochemical activity. Recently, the goal of CD focused on obtaining mucosal healing and deep remission rather than simple symptom control. These new therapeutic aims emphasize the need to prevent progression of bowel damage. In this study we aimed to evaluate the influence of different treatments on structural damage progression, assessed by means of LI in a series of CD patients consistently treated with various drugs.
The LI was calculated at inclusion and at the end of follow-up in 104 CD patients subdivided according to treatments received: biological drugs (n=40, 38.4%), azathioprine (n=19, 18.3%), and mesalazine (n=45, 43.3%).
The median follow-up was 29 months, with no difference among groups. During follow-up, the median LI was stable in the biological group [from 6.3 (range, 0.6-37.3) to 6.4 (range, 0.6-37.6), P=0.543], whereas it significantly increased from 4.1 (range, 0.6-30) to 8.3 (range, 0.6-31.8) in the azathioprine group (P=0.0006), and from 2.4 (range, 0.6-25.8) to 4.1 (range, 0.6-28.8) in the mesalazine group (P<0.0001). Also during follow-up the LI increased significantly (P=0.004) in the azathioprine (68.4%) and mesalazine (60.0%) groups as compared with the biological therapy group (30.0%).
In CD patients the LI tends to increase over time, although the use of biological drugs rather than azathioprine or mesalazine seems to be able to reduce the progressive bowel damage.
开发莱曼指数(LI)以独立于临床和生化活动评估克罗恩病(CD)患者肠道的累积结构损伤。最近,CD的目标聚焦于实现黏膜愈合和深度缓解,而非单纯的症状控制。这些新的治疗目标强调了预防肠道损伤进展的必要性。在本研究中,我们旨在评估不同治疗方法对结构损伤进展的影响,通过莱曼指数在一系列持续接受各种药物治疗的CD患者中进行评估。
在104例CD患者纳入时和随访结束时计算莱曼指数,这些患者根据接受的治疗进行细分:生物制剂(n = 40,38.4%)、硫唑嘌呤(n = 19,18.3%)和美沙拉嗪(n = 45,43.3%)。
中位随访时间为29个月,各组之间无差异。在随访期间,生物制剂组的莱曼指数中位数稳定[从6.3(范围,0.6 - 37.3)至6.4(范围,0.6 - 37.6),P = 0.543],而硫唑嘌呤组从4.1(范围,0.6 - 30)显著增加至8.3(范围,0.6 - 31.8)(P = 0.0006),美沙拉嗪组从2.4(范围,0.6 - 25.8)增加至4.1(范围,0.6 - 28.8)(P < 0.0001)。同样在随访期间,与生物治疗组(30.0%)相比,硫唑嘌呤组(68.4%)和美沙拉嗪组(60.0%)的莱曼指数显著增加(P = 0.004)。
在CD患者中,莱曼指数往往随时间增加,尽管使用生物制剂而非硫唑嘌呤或美沙拉嗪似乎能够减少肠道的渐进性损伤。