Guarinoni Milena Giovanna, Dignani Lucia, Motta Paolo Carlo
Professore a contratto, Dipartimento Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Scienze Radiologiche e Sanità Pubblica, Università of Brescia, Italia. PhD, MSN, RN. Correspondence:
Infermiere Coordinatore, Dipartimento di Emergenza, Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona, Italy. PhD, MSN, RN.
Prof Inferm. 2016 Jul-Sep;69(3):141-149. doi: 10.7429/pi.2016.693141.
This research aimed to explore the literature regarding the model of the Shared Decision Making (SDM) in the field of nursing.
A scoping review was conducted. The electronic literature research was made on Medline, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, using a combination of key words: "Decision Making", "Shared Decision Making", "Nursing", "Nursing Patient relationship". The review was carried out following the Levac model.
29 studies were included, in a time range between 1972 and 2015. The analysis identifies the main characteristics of the SDM model, the tools for its implementation, the patients experience, the fields of application and the integration among SDM e evidence based practice.
the analysis showed that the Shared Decision Making model is not widespread, especially in the Italian context. This phenomenon could be explained by three fundamental aspects. The concept is not widely disseminated and full scientific maturity. His application also seems to be related to extensive knowledge of gold standard interventions and possible alternatives. Finally, there are cultural barriers to the implementation of the SDM.
本研究旨在探讨护理领域中共享决策(SDM)模式的相关文献。
进行了一项范围综述。使用关键词组合“决策制定”“共享决策”“护理”“护患关系”,在Medline、CINAHL、考科蓝图书馆、谷歌学术上进行电子文献检索。该综述按照Levac模型进行。
纳入了1972年至2015年期间的29项研究。分析确定了共享决策模式的主要特征、实施工具、患者体验、应用领域以及共享决策与循证实践之间的整合情况。
分析表明,共享决策模式并不普遍,尤其是在意大利的背景下。这一现象可由三个基本方面来解释。该概念尚未广泛传播且科学上尚未完全成熟。其应用似乎还与对金标准干预措施和可能替代方案的广泛了解有关。最后,共享决策的实施存在文化障碍。