• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢功能量表阿拉伯语版本的拉施验证

Rasch validation of the Arabic version of the lower extremity functional scale.

作者信息

Alnahdi Ali H

机构信息

a Department of Rehabilitation Sciences , College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University , Riyadh , Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Feb;40(3):353-359. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1254285. Epub 2016 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2016.1254285
PMID:27866433
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the internal construct validity of the Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (20-item Arabic LEFS) using Rasch analysis.

METHODS

Patients (n = 170) with lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction were recruited. Rasch analysis of 20-item Arabic LEFS was performed. Once the initial Rasch analysis indicated that the 20-item Arabic LEFS did not fit the Rasch model, follow-up analyses were conducted to improve the fit of the scale to the Rasch measurement model. These modifications included removing misfitting individuals, changing item scoring structure, removing misfitting items, addressing bias caused by response dependency between items and differential item functioning (DIF).

RESULTS

Initial analysis indicated deviation of the 20-item Arabic LEFS from the Rasch model. Disordered thresholds in eight items and response dependency between six items were detected with the scale as a whole did not meet the requirement of unidimensionality. Refinements led to a 15-item Arabic LEFS that demonstrated excellent internal consistency (person separation index [PSI] = 0.92) and satisfied all the requirement of the Rasch model.

CONCLUSION

Rasch analysis did not support the 20-item Arabic LEFS as a unidimensional measure of lower extremity function. The refined 15-item Arabic LEFS met all the requirement of the Rasch model and hence is a valid objective measure of lower extremity function. The Rasch-validated 15-item Arabic LEFS needs to be further tested in an independent sample to confirm its fit to the Rasch measurement model. Implications for Rehabilitation The validity of the 20-item Arabic Lower Extremity Functional Scale to measure lower extremity function is not supported. The 15-item Arabic version of the LEFS is a valid measure of lower extremity function and can be used to quantify lower extremity function in patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用拉施分析检验下肢功能量表阿拉伯语版(20项阿拉伯语下肢功能量表,20-item Arabic LEFS)的内部结构效度。

方法

招募了170名下肢肌肉骨骼功能障碍患者。对20项阿拉伯语下肢功能量表进行拉施分析。一旦初始拉施分析表明20项阿拉伯语下肢功能量表不适合拉施模型,便进行后续分析以提高该量表与拉施测量模型的拟合度。这些修改包括剔除不拟合的个体、改变项目计分结构、剔除不拟合的项目、解决项目间反应依赖和差异项目功能(DIF)导致的偏差。

结果

初始分析表明20项阿拉伯语下肢功能量表偏离拉施模型。检测到8个项目的阈值无序,6个项目间存在反应依赖,且整个量表不满足单维度要求。经过改进得到了一个15项阿拉伯语下肢功能量表,该量表具有出色的内部一致性(个人分离指数[PSI]=0.92),并满足拉施模型的所有要求。

结论

拉施分析不支持将20项阿拉伯语下肢功能量表作为下肢功能的单维度测量工具。经过改进的15项阿拉伯语下肢功能量表满足拉施模型的所有要求,因此是下肢功能的有效客观测量工具。经过拉施验证的15项阿拉伯语下肢功能量表需要在独立样本中进一步测试,以确认其与拉施测量模型的拟合度。康复意义 20项阿拉伯语下肢功能量表测量下肢功能的效度未得到支持。15项阿拉伯语版下肢功能量表是下肢功能的有效测量工具,可用于量化下肢肌肉骨骼疾病患者的下肢功能。

相似文献

1
Rasch validation of the Arabic version of the lower extremity functional scale.下肢功能量表阿拉伯语版本的拉施验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Feb;40(3):353-359. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1254285. Epub 2016 Nov 20.
2
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale.下肢功能量表阿拉伯语版的跨文化适应、效度和信度
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):897-904. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1066452. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
3
Rasch analysis of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale: insights on dimensionality and suggestions for an improved 15-item version.意大利下肢功能量表的拉施分析:维度洞察及改进的15项版本建议
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Apr;31(4):532-543. doi: 10.1177/0269215516647180. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
4
Measurement properties of the 15-item Arabic lower extremity functional scale.15 项阿拉伯文下肢功能量表的测量特性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Dec;43(26):3839-3844. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1754927. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Reliability and validity of the Persian lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) in a heterogeneous sample of outpatients with lower limb musculoskeletal disorders.下肢功能量表(LEFS)在下肢肌肉骨骼疾病门诊患者异质样本中的可靠性和有效性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(1):10-5. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.775361. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
6
The Spanish lower extremity functional scale: a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to assess musculoskeletal disorders in the lower extremity.西班牙下肢功能量表:一种用于评估下肢肌肉骨骼疾病的可靠、有效且灵敏的问卷。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(23):2005-11. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.890673. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
7
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale.下肢功能量表阿拉伯语版本的验证性因素分析。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Mar;39(1):36-41. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000141.
8
A Rasch-validated version of the upper extremity functional index for interval-level measurement of upper extremity function.上肢功能指数的 Rasch 验证版本,用于间隔测量上肢功能。
Phys Ther. 2013 Nov;93(11):1507-19. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130041. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
9
Structural validity of the Arabic version of the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) using Rasch measurement model.使用拉施测量模型评估阿拉伯语版上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)的结构效度。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Nov 6;5(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00392-0.
10
Rasch analysis of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale for foot and ankle patients.足踝患者的下肢功能量表的 Rasch 分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Dec;41(24):2965-2971. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1483435. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale in elderly adults.老年人下肢功能量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 May-Jun;29(3):101196. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101196. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis.评估运动中功能性踝关节不稳:一项批判性综述与文献计量分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;12(17):1733. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171733.
3
Rasch and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Arabic Version of the Diabetes Self-Management Scale (DSMS): An Intercultural Approach.
糖尿病自我管理量表(DSMS)阿拉伯语版本的拉施分析和验证性因素分析:一种跨文化方法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;11(1):35. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010035.
4
Rasch validation of the Arabic version of the beach center family quality of life scale (BCFQOL-AR).海滩中心家庭生活质量量表阿拉伯语版(BCFQOL-AR)的拉施验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 3;13:984664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984664. eCollection 2022.
5
Psychometric Properties and Rasch Validation of the Teachers' Version of the Perception of Resources Questionnaire.教师版资源感知问卷的心理测量特性及拉施克验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 10;12:633801. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633801. eCollection 2021.
6
Rasch Analysis of the Japanese Version of Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices Scale: Scale Unidimensionality.《日本版全纳教育教师效能感量表的拉施分析:量表的单维度性》
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 29;11:1725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01725. eCollection 2020.
7
Rasch Validation of the Arabic Version of the Chedoke-McMaster Attitudes Toward Children With Handicaps (CATCH-AR) Scale.《Chedoke-麦马斯特对残疾儿童态度量表(阿拉伯语版)(CATCH-AR)的拉什分析验证》
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 24;10:2924. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02924. eCollection 2019.
8
Rasch Validation of the Arabic Version of the Behavioral Intention to Interact With Peers With Intellectual Disability Scale.智力残疾同伴互动行为意图量表阿拉伯语版本的拉施效度验证
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 16;10:2345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02345. eCollection 2019.