• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验透明度更新:对2013年在欧洲获批的与新药相关的公司资助试验结果披露情况的评估。

Clinical trial transparency update: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved in Europe in 2013.

作者信息

Deane Bryan R, Sivarajah Jacintha

机构信息

a Livewire Editorial Communications , Gerrards Cross , Bucks , UK.

b Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry , London , UK.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):473-478. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1263612. Epub 2017 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2016.1263612
PMID:27869482
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the timely disclosure of results of company-sponsored clinical trials related to all new medicines approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) during 2013. This is an extension of two previously reported studies of trials related to all new medicines approved in Europe in 2009, 2010 and 2011, and in 2012. The original study found that over a three year period over three-quarters of all trials were disclosed within 12 months and almost 90% were disclosed by the end of the study. The extension study (2012 approvals) showed an improvement in results disclosure within 12 months to 90%, and an overall disclosure rate of 92% by the end of the study.

METHODS

The methodology used was exactly as previously reported. Various publicly available information sources were searched for both clinical trial registration and disclosure of results. All completed company-sponsored trials related to each new medicine approved for marketing by the EMA in 2013, carried out in patients and recorded on a clinical trials registry and/or included in an EMA European Public Assessment Report (EPAR), were included. Information sources were searched between 1 May and 31 July 2015.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

The main outcome measure was the proportion of trials for which results had been disclosed on a registry or in the scientific literature either within 12 months of the later of either first regulatory approval or trial completion, or by 31 July 2015 (end of survey). Of the completed trials associated with 34 new medicines licensed to 24 different companies in 2013, results of 90% (484/539) had been disclosed within 12 months, and results of 93% (500/539) had been disclosed by 31 July 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

The disclosure rate within 12 months of 90% suggests that industry is continuing to achieve disclosure in a timely manner. The overall disclosure rate at study end of 93% indicates that the improvement in transparency amongst company-sponsored trials has been maintained in the trials associated with new medicines approved in 2013.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估2013年期间欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的所有新药相关的公司资助临床试验结果的及时披露情况。这是之前两项关于2009年、2010年、2011年以及2012年在欧洲批准的所有新药相关试验研究的扩展。原始研究发现,在三年时间里,超过四分之三的试验在12个月内披露,近90%在研究结束时披露。扩展研究(2012年批准情况)显示,12个月内结果披露率提高到90%,研究结束时总体披露率为92%。

方法

所使用的方法与之前报告的完全相同。搜索了各种公开可用的信息来源,以获取临床试验注册和结果披露情况。纳入了所有与2013年EMA批准上市的每种新药相关的已完成的公司资助试验,这些试验在患者中进行,并记录在临床试验登记处和/或包含在EMA欧洲公共评估报告(EPAR)中。于2015年5月1日至7月31日期间搜索信息来源。

结果指标与结果

主要结果指标是在首次监管批准或试验完成二者中较晚时间点起的12个月内,或在2015年7月31日(调查结束)之前,在登记处或科学文献中披露结果的试验比例。在与2013年授权给24家不同公司的34种新药相关的已完成试验中,90%(484/539) 的试验结果在12个月内披露,93%(500/539) 的试验结果在2015年7月31日之前披露。

结论

12个月内90%的披露率表明行业仍在继续及时进行披露。研究结束时93%的总体披露率表明,在与2013年批准的新药相关的试验中,公司资助试验的透明度提高情况得以保持。

相似文献

1
Clinical trial transparency update: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved in Europe in 2013.临床试验透明度更新:对2013年在欧洲获批的与新药相关的公司资助试验结果披露情况的评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):473-478. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1263612. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
2
Clinical trial transparency update: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved in Europe in 2014.临床试验透明度更新:评估 2014 年在欧洲批准的新药相关的公司赞助试验结果的披露情况。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jul;34(7):1239-1243. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1415057. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
Clinical trial transparency update: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved in Europe in 2012.临床试验透明度更新:对2012年在欧洲获批的与新药相关的公司资助试验结果披露情况的评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(7):1431-5. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1047749. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
4
Clinical trial transparency: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved recently in Europe.临床试验透明度:对与近期在欧洲批准的新药相关的公司赞助试验结果披露情况的评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Mar;30(3):395-405. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.860371. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
5
Clinical trial registration, reporting, publication and FDAAA compliance: a cross-sectional analysis and ranking of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2012.临床试验注册、报告、发表及《美国食品药品管理局安全与创新法案》合规情况:对2012年美国食品药品管理局批准的新药进行横断面分析及排名
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 12;5(11):e009758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009758.
6
Delays in completion and results reporting of clinical trials under the Paediatric Regulation in the European Union: A cohort study.欧盟《儿童用药规例》下临床试验完成和结果报告的延误:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 1;15(3):e1002520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002520. eCollection 2018 Mar.
7
Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies.衡量临床试验透明度:对新批准药物和大型制药公司的实证分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 5;7(12):e017917. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017917.
8
Sharing of clinical trial data and results reporting practices among large pharmaceutical companies: cross sectional descriptive study and pilot of a tool to improve company practices.大型制药公司临床试验数据共享和结果报告实践情况:改善公司实践的工具的横断面描述性研究和试点。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 10;366:l4217. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4217.
9
Transparency and credibility of industry-sponsored clinical trial publications: a survey of journal editors.行业资助临床试验出版物的透明度和可信度:期刊编辑调查。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Jul;35(7):1221-1230. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1570770. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
10
Transparent collaboration between industry and academia can serve unmet patient need and contribute to reproductive public health.透明的产学合作可以满足未满足的患者需求,并有助于生殖公共卫生。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1549-1555. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex230.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to publication for results of clinical trials.临床试验结果的发表时间。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 27;11(11):MR000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000011.pub3.
2
Availability of results of clinical trials registered on EU Clinical Trials Register: cross sectional audit study.欧盟临床试验注册库中注册的临床试验结果的可获取性:横断面审计研究
BMJ Med. 2024 Jan 12;3(1):e000738. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000738. eCollection 2024.