Nicolson Donald
BA (Hons), MSc, PhD Health Services Research.
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Nov;107(11):562-563. doi: 10.1701/2484.25958.
Academic conferences have to date largely evaded empirical examination, despite demanding a lot of time and effort from those attending. Based on my work for a forthcoming book, I consider examples of conferences, including the Cochrane Colloquium, that provide important lessons from which we can learn about the impact of conferences. Travel to the conference, the venue, and when it is held can be a barrier to delegates attending, impacting on what will be said and discussed. By sharing new knowledge and wisdom, conferences act as a signal that cuts through the noise and adds to the “Knowledge Enterprise”. But if the delegates are too tired from travel or do not attend, it is not possible to meaningfully discuss issues. There is a need for the evolving discipline of Meta-research to examine research conferences, and for academics to discuss and challenge the role and value, and usefulness of academic conferences.
迄今为止,学术会议在很大程度上规避了实证检验,尽管参会者为此付出了大量时间和精力。基于我为一本即将出版的书所做的工作,我思考了一些会议的例子,包括考克兰学术研讨会,这些会议提供了重要的经验教训,让我们能够了解会议的影响。前往会议的行程、会议地点以及会议时间都可能成为代表参会的障碍,进而影响会上的发言和讨论内容。通过分享新知识和智慧,会议起到了一种穿透噪音并为“知识事业”添砖加瓦的信号作用。但如果代表们因旅途劳累而疲惫不堪或未能参会,就无法对问题进行有意义的讨论。元研究这一不断发展的学科需要审视研究会议,学者们也需要讨论并质疑学术会议的作用、价值和实用性。