• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合护理机构:医疗保险对居家护理的资助。

Integrated care organizations: Medicare financing for care at home.

作者信息

Davis Karen, Willink Amber, Schoen Cathy

机构信息

624 N. Broadway, Room 693, Baltimore, MD 21205. E-mail

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2016 Nov;22(11):764-768.

PMID:27870546
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

As the boomer population ages, there is a growing need for integrated care organizations (ICOs) that can integrate both medical care and long-term services and supports in the home. This paper presents a policy proposal to support the creation of ICOs, redesign care, and provide financing for home- and community-based services (HCBS), with the goal of enhancing financial protection for beneficiaries, coordinating care, and preventing costly hospital and nursing home use.

METHODS

This study used the 2012 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) Cost and Use File, inflated to 2016 figures, to describe the characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries and their healthcare utilization and spending. The costs of covering up to 20 hours of personal care services a week were estimated using MCBS population counts, participation assumptions based on the literature, and financing design parameters.

RESULTS

A targeted HCBS benefit could be added to Medicare and financed with income-related cost sharing ranging from 5% to 50%, a premium paid by Medicare beneficiaries of approximately $42 a month, and payroll taxes estimated at around 0.4% of earnings on employers and employees.

CONCLUSIONS

Adoption of an HCBS benefit in Medicare would improve financial protection for beneficiaries with physical and/or cognitive impairment and provide the financing for health organizations to better integrate medical and social services. ICOs and delivery models of care emphasizing care at home would improve accessibility of care and avoid costly institutionalization; additionally, it would also reduce beneficiary reliance on Medicaid.

摘要

目标

随着婴儿潮一代人口老龄化,对能够整合家庭医疗护理以及长期服务与支持的综合护理组织(ICO)的需求日益增长。本文提出一项政策建议,以支持ICO的创建、重新设计护理模式,并为居家和社区服务(HCBS)提供资金,目标是增强对受益人的财务保护、协调护理,并避免昂贵的住院和养老院使用。

方法

本研究使用了2012年医疗保险当前受益人调查(MCBS)成本与使用文件,并将其数据膨胀至2016年的数据,以描述医疗保险受益人的特征及其医疗保健利用情况和支出。使用MCBS人口计数、基于文献的参与假设以及融资设计参数,估算了每周提供长达20小时个人护理服务的成本。

结果

可以在医疗保险中增加一项有针对性的HCBS福利,并通过5%至50%的与收入相关的成本分摊、医疗保险受益人每月约42美元的保费以及估计约占雇主和雇员收入0.4%的工资税来提供资金。

结论

在医疗保险中采用HCBS福利将改善对身体和/或认知受损受益人的财务保护,并为卫生组织提供资金,以更好地整合医疗和社会服务。ICO以及强调居家护理的护理提供模式将提高护理的可及性并避免昂贵的机构化;此外,这还将减少受益人对医疗补助的依赖。

相似文献

1
Integrated care organizations: Medicare financing for care at home.综合护理机构:医疗保险对居家护理的资助。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Nov;22(11):764-768.
2
Improving Benefits and Integrating Care for Older Medicare Beneficiaries with Physical or Cognitive Impairment.改善身体或认知功能受损的老年医疗保险受益人的福利并整合护理服务。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Oct;38:1-14.
3
Integrated Home- and Community-Based Services Improve Community Survival Among Independence at Home Medicare Beneficiaries Without Increasing Medicaid Costs.综合性居家和社区服务可提高居家 Medicare 受益人的社区生存率,而不会增加医疗补助成本。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1495-1501. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15968. Epub 2019 May 10.
4
The effects of state-level expenditures for home- and community-based services on the risk of becoming a long-stay nursing home resident after hip fracture.州级家庭和社区服务支出对髋部骨折后成为长期疗养院居民风险的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3327-3. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
5
Out-of-pocket health spending by poor and near-poor elderly Medicare beneficiaries.贫困和接近贫困的老年医疗保险受益人的自付医疗费用。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):241-54.
6
Health Care Expenditures After Initiating Long-term Services and Supports in the Community Versus in a Nursing Facility.在社区与护理机构开始接受长期服务和支持后的医疗保健支出。
Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000491.
7
Understanding dual enrollees' use of Medicare home health services: the effects of differences in Medicaid home care programs.了解双重参保者对医疗保险家庭健康服务的使用情况:医疗补助家庭护理计划差异的影响。
Med Care. 2000 Jan;38(1):90-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200001000-00010.
8
Long-Term Care: Funding of Long-Term Care.长期护理:长期护理的资金筹集
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2015 Dec 28:1-52.
9
Long-term care: funding of long-term care. Issue brief.长期护理:长期护理的资金筹集。问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Dec 31:1-46.
10
Risk of nursing home admission among older americans: does states' spending on home- and community-based services matter?美国老年人入住养老院的风险:各州在居家和社区服务上的支出重要吗?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 May;62(3):S169-78. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.3.s169.

引用本文的文献

1
Paying for home care out-of-pocket is common and costly across the income spectrum among older adults.在老年人中,自掏腰包支付家庭护理费用的情况很常见,而且在各个收入阶层中成本都很高。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jan 16;3(1):qxae180. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae180. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Home-Based Primary and Palliative Care in the Medicaid Program: Systematic Review of the Literature.基于家庭的医疗补助计划中的初级和姑息治疗:文献系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jan;69(1):245-254. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16837. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
3
Cost-Effective Care Coordination for People With Dementia at Home.
为居家痴呆症患者提供具有成本效益的护理协调服务。
Innov Aging. 2020 Jan 1;4(2):igz051. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igz051. eCollection 2020.