Suzanne K. Chambers, Stefano Occhipinti, Melissa Legg, and David P. Smith, Griffith University, Gold Coast; Suzanne K. Chambers, Samantha Clutton, Melissa Legg, Cancer Council Queensland; Robert A. Gardiner, University of Queensland, Brisbane; Suzanne K. Chambers, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland; Suzanne K. Chambers, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia; Suzanne K. Chambers, Stefano Occhipinti, Samantha Clutton, Melissa Legg, Martin Berry, Martin R. Stockler, Mark Frydenberg, Robert A. Gardiner, Ian D. Davis, and David P. Smith, Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group; Elizabeth Foley, Mind Potential; Martin R. Stockler, and David P. Smith, University of Sydney; David P. Smith, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney; Martin Berry, Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford; Martin R. Stockler, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales; Suzanne K. Chambers, Robert A. Gardiner, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia; Mark Frydenberg, Monash Health; Mark Frydenberg, Ian D. Davis, Monash University; Ian D. Davis, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and Stephen J. Lepore, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 20;35(3):291-297. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.8788. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
Purpose Advanced prostate cancer (PC) is associated with substantial psychosocial morbidity. We sought to determine whether mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) reduces distress in men with advanced PC. Methods Men with advanced PC (proven metastatic and/or castration-resistant biochemical progression) were randomly assigned to an 8-week, group-based MBCT intervention delivered by telephone (n = 94) or to minimally enhanced usual care (n = 95). Primary intervention outcomes were psychological distress, cancer-specific distress, and prostate-specific antigen anxiety. Mindfulness skills were assessed as potential mediators of effect. Participants were assessed at baseline and were followed up at 3, 6, and 9 months. Main statistical analyses were conducted on the basis of intention to treat. Results Fourteen MBCT groups were conducted in the intervention arm. Facilitator adherence ratings were high (> 93%). Using random-effects mixed-regression models, intention-to-treat analyses indicated no significant changes in intervention outcomes or in engagement with mindfulness for men in MBCT compared with those receiving minimally enhanced usual care. Per-protocol analyses also found no differences between arms in outcomes or engagement, with the exception of the mindfulness skill of observing, which increased over time for men in MBCT compared with usual care ( P = .032). Conclusion MBCT in this format was not more effective than minimally enhanced usual care in reducing distress in men with advanced PC. Future intervention research for these men should consider approaches that map more closely to masculinity.
晚期前列腺癌(PC)与大量的心理社会发病率相关。我们旨在确定基于正念认知疗法(MBCT)是否能减轻晚期 PC 患者的痛苦。
我们将患有晚期 PC(已确诊转移性和/或去势抵抗性生化进展)的男性患者随机分配到为期 8 周的基于小组的 MBCT 电话干预组(n = 94)或最低程度增强的常规护理组(n = 95)。主要干预结果是心理困扰、癌症特异性困扰和前列腺特异性抗原焦虑。正念技能被评估为潜在的效应调节剂。参与者在基线时进行评估,并在 3、6 和 9 个月时进行随访。主要统计分析是基于意向治疗进行的。
在干预组中进行了 14 个 MBCT 小组。协调员的依从性评分很高(>93%)。使用随机效应混合回归模型,意向治疗分析表明,与接受最低程度增强的常规护理相比,MBCT 组男性的干预结果或对正念的参与没有显著变化。方案分析也发现,除了 MBCT 组男性的观察正念技能随着时间的推移而增加(P =.032)外,两组在结果或参与度上没有差异。
这种形式的 MBCT 并没有比最低程度增强的常规护理更有效地减轻晚期 PC 患者的痛苦。未来针对这些男性的干预研究应考虑更符合男性气质的方法。