Jamleh Ahmed, Alfouzan Khalid
Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
J Endod. 2016 Dec;42(12):1811-1814. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.022.
To evaluate the vertical load induced with the Twisted File Adaptive (TFA; SybronEndo, Orange, CA) system during canal shaping of extracted teeth by comparing it with the Twisted File (TF, SybronEndo), ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), and ProTaper Universal (PTU, Dentsply Maillefer) systems.
Fifty-two root canals were shaped using the TFA, TF, PTN, or PTU systems (n = 13 for each system). They were shaped gently according to the manufacturers' instructions. During canal shaping, vertical loads were recorded and shown in 2 directions, apically and coronally directed loads. The vertical peak loads of 3 instrumentation stages were used for comparison. The effects of rotary systems on the mean positive and negative peak loads were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests at a confidence level of 95%.
The overall pattern of the instantaneous loads appeared to increase with the use of successive instruments within the system. During canal shaping in all groups, the apically and coronally directed peak loads ranged from 0.84-7.55 N and 2.16-2.79 N, respectively. There were significant differences in both peak loads among the tested systems at each instrumentation stage. TFA had the lowest apically directed peak loads. In terms of coronally directed peak loads, the TFA and TF had a significantly lower amount of loads developed with their instruments than PTN and PTU.
The choice of instrument system had an influence on the loads developed during canal shaping. TFA instruments were associated favorably with the lowest values of peak loads followed by TF, PTN, and PTU.
通过将Twisted File Adaptive(TFA;SybronEndo,加利福尼亚州奥兰治)系统与Twisted File(TF,SybronEndo)、ProTaper Next(PTN;登士柏玛尼菲,瑞士巴拉伊格)和ProTaper Universal(PTU,登士柏玛尼菲)系统进行比较,评估在拔除牙齿根管预备过程中该系统产生的垂直负荷。
使用TFA、TF、PTN或PTU系统对52个根管进行预备(每个系统n = 13)。按照制造商的说明轻柔地进行预备。在根管预备过程中,记录垂直负荷并显示在两个方向上,即根尖向和冠向负荷。使用三个预备阶段的垂直峰值负荷进行比较。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney检验在95%置信水平下对旋转系统对平均正负峰值负荷的影响进行统计学分析。
随着系统内连续使用器械,瞬时负荷的总体模式似乎增加。在所有组的根管预备过程中,根尖向和冠向峰值负荷分别为0.84 - 7.55 N和2.16 - 2.79 N。在每个预备阶段,测试系统之间的两个峰值负荷均存在显著差异。TFA的根尖向峰值负荷最低。就冠向峰值负荷而言,TFA和TF器械产生的负荷量明显低于PTN和PTU。
器械系统的选择对根管预备过程中产生的负荷有影响。TFA器械产生的峰值负荷值最低,其次是TF、PTN和PTU。