Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
PeerJ. 2023 Aug 8;11:e15830. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15830. eCollection 2023.
This study compared the ability of thermally treated files in shaping simulated canals with double curvature. Fifty-six canals were enlarged to a final size of 25 with ProTaper Next (PTN) or ZenFlex (ZF).
Half of the samples were shaped with cooled files ( = 14 each). The amount of removed resin was measured and canal deviation was determined at eight levels. Shaping time and maximum shaping torque values were also recorded. Data were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and LSD, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests at a 0.05 significance level.
Compared to PTN and cooled PTN, ZF and cooled ZF required lesser time to shape the canals. The maximum torques were found comparable between the groups. All the groups generated negligible deviations at every canal level evaluated and maintained the canal geometry. Although not significant, the cooled PTN and ZF files exhibited lesser canal deviations than their counterparts.
All groups demonstrated similar shaping ability whilst maintaining the original curvature of the canal in simulated canals with double curvature. However, ZF groups were able to shape the canals faster than PTN groups. There was a trend that cooled files made lesser canal deviations compared to their counterparts.
本研究比较了热处理器械在成形双弯曲模拟根管中的能力。56 个根管用 ProTaper Next(PTN)或 ZenFlex(ZF)扩大到 25 号。
一半的样本用冷却的器械成形(每组各 14 个)。测量了去除的树脂量,并在八个水平确定了根管偏移。还记录了成形时间和最大成形扭矩值。数据使用方差分析和 LSD、Kruskal-Wallis 和卡方检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为 0.05。
与 PTN 和冷却的 PTN 相比,ZF 和冷却的 ZF 需要更少的时间来成形根管。各组的最大扭矩相当。所有组在评估的每个根管水平都产生了可忽略不计的偏差,并保持了根管的几何形状。尽管不显著,但冷却的 PTN 和 ZF 锉比它们的同类锉产生的根管偏差更小。
所有组在双弯曲模拟根管中都表现出相似的成形能力,同时保持了根管的原始曲率。然而,ZF 组能够比 PTN 组更快地成形根管。有一个趋势表明,冷却的器械比它们的同类器械产生的根管偏差更小。