Havdahl Karoline Alexandra, Hus Bal Vanessa, Huerta Marisela, Pickles Andrew, Øyen Anne-Siri, Stoltenberg Camilla, Lord Catherine, Bishop Somer L
Norwegian Institute of Public Health and Lovisenberg Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
University of California-San Francisco.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;55(12):1054-1063.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.490. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Growing awareness that symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) transcend multiple diagnostic categories, and major advances in the identification of genetic syndromes associated with ASD, have led to widespread use of ASD symptom measures in etiologic studies of neurodevelopmental disorders. Insufficient consideration of potentially confounding factors such as cognitive ability or behavior problems can have important negative consequences in interpretation of findings, including erroneous estimation of associations between ASD and etiologic factors.
Participants were 388 children 2 to 13 years old with diagnoses of ASD or another neurodevelopmental disorder without ASD. Receiver operating characteristics methods were used to assess the influence of IQ and emotional and behavioral problems on the discriminative ability of 3 widely used ASD symptom measures: the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS).
IQ influenced the discriminative thresholds of the SRS and ADI-R, and emotional and behavioral problems affected the discriminative thresholds of the SRS, ADI-R, and ADOS. This resulted in low specificity of ASD cutoffs on the SRS and ADI-R for children with intellectual disability without ASD (27-42%) and low specificity across all 3 instruments for children without ASD with increased emotional and behavioral problems (36-59%). Adjustment for these characteristics resulted in improved discriminative ability for all of the ASD measures.
The findings indicate that scores on ASD symptom measures reflect far more than ASD symptoms. Valid interpretation of scores on these measures requires steps to account for the influences of IQ and emotional and behavioral problems.
人们越来越意识到自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的症状跨越多个诊断类别,并且在与ASD相关的遗传综合征识别方面取得了重大进展,这导致ASD症状测量在神经发育障碍病因学研究中得到广泛应用。对认知能力或行为问题等潜在混杂因素考虑不足,可能会在研究结果的解释中产生重要的负面后果,包括对ASD与病因因素之间关联的错误估计。
研究对象为388名2至13岁被诊断为ASD或其他非ASD神经发育障碍的儿童。采用受试者工作特征方法来评估智商以及情绪和行为问题对3种广泛使用的ASD症状测量工具的鉴别能力的影响,这3种工具分别是:社会反应量表(SRS)、自闭症诊断访谈修订版(ADI-R)和自闭症诊断观察量表(ADOS)。
智商影响了SRS和ADI-R的鉴别阈值,情绪和行为问题影响了SRS、ADI-R和ADOS的鉴别阈值。这导致对于无ASD的智力残疾儿童,SRS和ADI-R上ASD临界值的特异性较低(27%-42%),而对于情绪和行为问题增加的无ASD儿童,所有3种工具的特异性都较低(36%-59%)。对这些特征进行调整后,所有ASD测量工具的鉴别能力都有所提高。
研究结果表明,ASD症状测量的分数所反映的远不止ASD症状。要对这些测量工具的分数进行有效解释,需要采取措施来考虑智商以及情绪和行为问题的影响。