Kumahor Samuel K, Hron Pavel, Metreveli George, Schaumann Gabriele E, Klitzke Sondra, Lang Friederike, Vogel Hans-Jörg
Department of Soil Physics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Strasse 4, 06120 Halle-Saale, Germany.
Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 368, Raum 422, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
J Contam Hydrol. 2016 Dec;195:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
Engineered nanoparticles released into soils may be coated with humic substances, potentially modifying their surface properties. Due to their amphiphilic nature, humic coating is expected to affect interaction of nanoparticle at the air-water interface. In this study, we explored the roles of the air-water interface and solid-water interface as potential sites for nanoparticle attachment and the importance of hydrophobic interactions for nanoparticle attachment at the air-water interface. By exposing Ag nanoparticles to soil solution extracted from the upper soil horizon of a floodplain soil, the mobility of the resulting "soil-aged" Ag nanoparticles was investigated and compared with the mobility of citrate-coated Ag nanoparticles as investigated in an earlier study. The mobility was determined as a function of hydrologic conditions and solution chemistry using column breakthrough curves and numerical modeling. Specifically, we compared the mobility of both types of nanoparticles for different unsaturated flow conditions and for pH=5 and pH=9. The soil-aged Ag NP were less mobile at pH=5 than at pH=9 due to lower electrostatic repulsion at pH=5 for both types of interfaces. Moreover, the physical flow field at different water contents modified the impact of chemical forces at the solid-water interface. An extended Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (eDLVO) model did not provide satisfactory explanation of the observed transport phenomena unlike for the citrate-coated case. For instance, the eDLVO model assuming sphere-plate geometry predicts a high energy barrier (>90 kT) for the solid-water interface, indicating that nanoparticle attachment is less likely. Furthermore, retardation through reversible sorption at the air-water interface was probably less relevant for soil-aged nanoparticles than for citrate-coated nanoparticles. An additional cation bridging mechanism and straining within the flow field may have enhanced nanoparticle retention at the solid-water interface. The results indicate that the mobility of engineered Ag nanoparticles is sensitive to solution chemistry, especially pH and the concentration of multivalent cations, and to the unsaturated flow conditions influencing particle interaction at biogeochemical interfaces.
释放到土壤中的工程纳米颗粒可能会被腐殖质包裹,这可能会改变它们的表面性质。由于腐殖质具有两亲性,预计其包裹会影响纳米颗粒在气-水界面的相互作用。在本研究中,我们探讨了气-水界面和固-水界面作为纳米颗粒附着潜在位点的作用,以及疏水相互作用对纳米颗粒在气-水界面附着的重要性。通过将银纳米颗粒暴露于从泛滥平原土壤上层土壤层提取的土壤溶液中,研究了所得“土壤老化”银纳米颗粒的迁移率,并与早期研究中研究的柠檬酸盐包裹的银纳米颗粒的迁移率进行了比较。使用柱突破曲线和数值模型,将迁移率确定为水文条件和溶液化学的函数。具体而言,我们比较了两种类型的纳米颗粒在不同非饱和流条件下以及pH = 5和pH = 9时的迁移率。由于在两种界面的pH = 5时静电排斥较低,土壤老化的银纳米颗粒在pH = 5时的迁移率低于pH = 9时。此外,不同含水量下的物理流场改变了固-水界面处化学力的影响。与柠檬酸盐包裹的情况不同,扩展的Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek(eDLVO)模型未能对观察到的传输现象提供令人满意的解释。例如,假设球-板几何形状的eDLVO模型预测固-水界面的能垒很高(>90 kT),这表明纳米颗粒附着的可能性较小。此外,与柠檬酸盐包裹的纳米颗粒相比,通过在气-水界面的可逆吸附引起的阻滞对土壤老化的纳米颗粒可能不太重要。额外的阳离子桥接机制和流场内的过滤作用可能增强了纳米颗粒在固-水界面的保留。结果表明,工程银纳米颗粒的迁移率对溶液化学,特别是pH和多价阳离子浓度敏感,并且对影响生物地球化学界面处颗粒相互作用的非饱和流条件敏感。