Madrigal Emilio, Prajapati Shyam, Avadhani Vaidehi, Annen Kyle, Friedman Mark T
Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Transfusion. 2017 Feb;57(2):367-375. doi: 10.1111/trf.13917. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
A previous study in our hospitals correlated suboptimal documentation and failure to justify transfusions. In light of implemented blood-conservation strategies, including patient blood management (PBM) and prospective audits (PAs), we performed a follow-up study.
We reviewed prospectively audited red blood cell (RBC) transfusions received by adult patients from January to July 2014. Survey forms were used to assess the level of documentation and to classify documentation as adequate, intermediate, or inadequate. Transfusions were deemed justified or not by comparisons with hospital transfusion guidelines. We also analyzed the effect of implemented blood-conservation strategies on our hospital transfusion rates and costs from 2009 to 2015.
During the study period, there were 259 prospectively audited transfusion events (TEs) (one or more RBC units transfused to a patient), of which we reviewed 94 TEs (36.3%) in 87 patients. TEs with suboptimal (intermediate and inadequate) documentation accounted for 46.8% of the reviewed TEs, of which 81.8% could not be justified compared with 18.0% of nonjustified, adequately documented TEs. The correlation between suboptimal documentation and failure to justify transfusion was significant (p < 0.001). This correlation remained even in a comparison between the site with a PBM program and the sites without such a program. Overall transfusion rates declined after the introduction of PA, although the decline was only statistically significant at the sites with a PBM program.
Suboptimal transfusion documentation remains problematic and is highly correlated with nonjustifiable transfusions. Newly adopted approaches to minimize blood transfusions have not improved transfusion documentation and corresponding out-of-guideline transfusions, although overall transfusions have been reduced by PA, particularly in the setting of a PBM program.
我们医院之前的一项研究表明输血记录不充分与输血理由不合理相关。鉴于已实施的血液保护策略,包括患者血液管理(PBM)和前瞻性审计(PA),我们进行了一项随访研究。
我们前瞻性地回顾了2014年1月至7月成年患者接受的红细胞(RBC)输血情况。使用调查问卷评估记录水平,并将记录分为充分、中等或不充分。通过与医院输血指南进行比较来判断输血是否合理。我们还分析了2009年至2015年实施的血液保护策略对我院输血率和成本的影响。
在研究期间,共有259例前瞻性审计的输血事件(TEs)(向一名患者输注一个或多个RBC单位),其中我们回顾了87例患者的94例TEs(36.3%)。记录不充分(中等和不充分)的TEs占所回顾TEs的46.8%,其中81.8%的输血无法证明合理,而记录充分的TEs中这一比例为18.0%。记录不充分与输血理由不合理之间的相关性显著(p < 0.001)。即使在有PBM计划的科室与没有该计划的科室之间进行比较,这种相关性仍然存在。引入PA后总体输血率下降,尽管仅在有PBM计划的科室下降具有统计学意义。
输血记录不充分仍然是个问题,并且与不合理输血高度相关。新采用的尽量减少输血的方法并未改善输血记录及相应的超指南输血情况,尽管PA总体上减少了输血,特别是在PBM计划的背景下。