Frisch Nicholas B, Nahm Nickolas J, Khalil Jad G, Les Clifford M, Guthrie Stuart T, Charters Michael A
Orthopedics. 2017 Mar 1;40(2):83-88. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20161116-01. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
This study compared patients who underwent treatment with short or long cephalomedullary nails with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression. Patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 or A3 pertrochanteric fractures treated with either short (n=72) or long (n=97) InterTAN (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee) cephalomedullary nails were reviewed. Information on perioperative measures (estimated blood loss, surgical time, and fluoroscopy time) and postoperative orthopedic complications (infection, implant failure, screw cutout, and periprosthetic femur fracture) was included. Estimated blood loss (short nail, 161 mL; long nail, 208 mL; P=.002) and surgical time (short nail, 64 minutes; long nail, 83 minutes; P=.001) were lower in the short nail group. There were no differences in fluoroscopy time (short nail, 90 seconds; long nail, 142 seconds; P=.071) or rates of infection (short nail, 1.4%; long nail, 3.1%; P=.637) or overall orthopedic complications (short nail, 11.1%; long nail, 9.3%; P=.798) between the 2 groups. The long nail group had a trend toward more screw cutouts (long nail, 5.2%; short nail, 0.0%; P=.134) but fewer periprosthetic femur fractures (short nail, 8.3%; long nail, 0.0%; P=.013). This study found a similar overall rate of orthopedic complications between short and long nails with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression. These results confirm the suspected advantages of short nails, including faster surgery and less blood loss; however, the rate of periprosthetic femur fracture remains high, despite changes to implant design. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):83-88.].
本研究比较了接受短型或长型带集成式头颈螺钉和线性加压的股骨髓内钉治疗的患者。回顾了采用短型(n = 72)或长型(n = 97)InterTAN(史赛克公司,田纳西州孟菲斯)股骨髓内钉治疗的AO/OTA 31 - A2或A3型转子周围骨折患者。纳入了围手术期指标(估计失血量、手术时间和透视时间)以及术后骨科并发症(感染、植入物失败、螺钉穿出和假体周围股骨骨折)的信息。短型髓内钉组的估计失血量(短型髓内钉,161 mL;长型髓内钉,208 mL;P = 0.002)和手术时间(短型髓内钉,64分钟;长型髓内钉,83分钟;P = 0.001)较低。两组间透视时间(短型髓内钉,90秒;长型髓内钉,142秒;P = 0.071)、感染率(短型髓内钉,1.4%;长型髓内钉,3.1%;P = 0.637)或总体骨科并发症(短型髓内钉,11.1%;长型髓内钉,9.3%;P = 0.798)无差异。长型髓内钉组螺钉穿出有增多趋势(长型髓内钉,5.2%;短型髓内钉,0.0%;P = 0.134),但假体周围股骨骨折较少(短型髓内钉,8.3%;长型髓内钉,0.0%;P = 0.013)。本研究发现,带集成式头颈螺钉和线性加压的短型和长型髓内钉的总体骨科并发症发生率相似。这些结果证实了短型髓内钉的疑似优势,包括手术更快和失血更少;然而,尽管植入物设计有所改变,假体周围股骨骨折的发生率仍然很高。[《骨科》。2017;40(2):83 - 88。]