Suppr超能文献

第一阶段莫氏显微外科手术中打孔评分法与徒手绘图法的回顾性研究

Retrospective Study of Punch Scoring Versus Freehand Approach for First Stage Mohs Micrographic Surgery.

作者信息

Cheraghi Nikoo, Jfri Abdulhadi, Bacigalupi Robert, Khorasani Hooman

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, New York Medical College, New York, New York.

Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016 Sep;9(9):55-56. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

Abstract

The objective was to observe whether there is a difference in the number of subjects requiring more than one stage of Mohs micrographic surgery for small lesion nonmelanoma skin cancers using the punch scoring method versus freehand approach. Retrospective review. Outpatient Mohs Clinic. Thirty patients with small lesion (<5mm) basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma who had Mohs micrographic surgery using either the punch scoring method (15) for scoring the first layer or the freehand method (15). Differences between the two groups were evaluated by the number of subjects requiring more than one stage and the reason for any additional stages. There was no observed difference in the number of subjects requiring more than one Mohs stage between the punch scoring group and the freehand group. Dermatologic surgeons can use the punch scoring method or the freehand approach for scoring small lesion Mohs based on provider preference.

摘要

目的是观察对于小病灶非黑色素瘤皮肤癌,使用打孔计分法与徒手操作法进行莫氏显微外科手术时,需要不止一个阶段手术的患者数量是否存在差异。回顾性研究。门诊莫氏诊所。30例患有小病灶(<5mm)基底细胞癌和鳞状细胞癌的患者接受了莫氏显微外科手术,其中15例使用打孔计分法对第一层进行计分,另外15例使用徒手操作法。通过需要不止一个阶段手术的患者数量以及任何额外阶段的原因来评估两组之间的差异。在打孔计分组和徒手操作组之间,未观察到需要不止一个莫氏阶段手术的患者数量存在差异。皮肤科外科医生可根据个人偏好,使用打孔计分法或徒手操作法对小病灶莫氏手术进行计分。

相似文献

4
Mohs micrographic surgery: a cost analysis.莫氏显微外科手术:成本分析
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998 Nov;39(5 Pt 1):698-703. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70041-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验