Cook J, Zitelli J A
Department of Dermatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998 Nov;39(5 Pt 1):698-703. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70041-6.
The incidence of skin cancer is increasing significantly, and many people have declared the increase an epidemic. It was estimated that 900,000 to 1.2 million cases of nonmelanoma skin cancer occurred in the United States in 1994. With increasing pressure to deliver cost-effective medical care, physicians must understand the cost and value of the various methods to treat skin cancer.
Our purpose was to define the true cost of treating a series of skin cancers with the Mohs micrographic technique and compare our costs with calculated estimates of the costs to treat the same cancers with traditional methods of surgical excision.
A group of 400 consecutive tumors was selected. The cost of treatment in the reference group included diagnosis, Mohs micrographic surgery, reconstruction (if applicable), follow-up, and the cost to treat disease recurrence. These costs were then compared with traditional methods of surgical excision: excision with permanent section margin control, excision with frozen section margin control, and excision with frozen section margin control in an ambulatory surgical facility. For cost comparisons, it was assumed that all tumors in the comparison groups would be excised with standard surgical margins and the resultant surgical defects would be reconstructed with the simplest method possible. The costs of diagnosis, excision, pathology, reconstruction, and the cost to treat disease recurrence were then calculated and compared with the costs of treating the lesions with Mohs micrographic surgery.
Our calculation of costs documents that Mohs micrographic surgery is similar in cost to office-based traditional surgical excision and less expensive than ambulatory surgical facility-based surgical excision. The average cost of Mohs micrographic surgery was $1243 versus $1167 for excision with permanent section margin control, $1400 for excision in the office with frozen section margin control, and $1973 for excision with frozen section margin control in an ambulatory surgical facility. Analysis based on anatomic location yielded similar results.
Mohs micrographic surgery is a method of surgical excision with high intrinsic value that is cost-effective in comparison to traditional surgical excision.
皮肤癌的发病率正在显著上升,许多人宣称这一增长已成为一种流行病。据估计,1994年美国发生了90万至120万例非黑色素瘤皮肤癌病例。随着提供具有成本效益的医疗服务的压力不断增加,医生必须了解治疗皮肤癌的各种方法的成本和价值。
我们的目的是确定用莫氏显微外科技术治疗一系列皮肤癌的实际成本,并将我们的成本与用传统手术切除方法治疗相同癌症的计算成本估计值进行比较。
选择连续的400个肿瘤。参考组的治疗成本包括诊断、莫氏显微外科手术、重建(如适用)、随访以及治疗疾病复发的成本。然后将这些成本与传统手术切除方法进行比较:永久切片边缘控制下的切除、冰冻切片边缘控制下的切除以及在门诊手术设施中进行的冰冻切片边缘控制下的切除。为了进行成本比较,假设比较组中的所有肿瘤都将以标准手术切缘切除,并且由此产生的手术缺损将以尽可能简单的方法进行重建。然后计算诊断、切除病理、重建以及治疗疾病复发的成本,并与用莫氏显微外科手术治疗病变的成本进行比较。
我们的成本计算表明,莫氏显微外科手术的成本与基于办公室的传统手术切除相似,并且比基于门诊手术设施的手术切除便宜。莫氏显微外科手术的平均成本为1243美元,而永久切片边缘控制下的切除为1167美元,办公室冰冻切片边缘控制下的切除为1400美元,门诊手术设施中冰冻切片边缘控制下的切除为1973美元。基于解剖位置的分析得出了类似的结果。
莫氏显微外科手术是一种具有高内在价值的手术切除方法,与传统手术切除相比具有成本效益。