Suppr超能文献

下尿路症状的医学治疗对良性前列腺增生手术的影响:我们手术是否太晚了?

The influence of the medical treatment of LUTS on benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery: do we operate too late?

作者信息

Presicce Fabrizio, DE Nunzio Cosimo, Gacci Mauro, Sosnowsky Roman, Lombardo Riccardo, Porpiglia Francesco, Tubaro Andrea

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy -

Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Jun;69(3):242-252. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02815-0. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this article is to systematically collect the available evidence on the influence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) medical treatment on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search January 1990 until June 2016 was performed by combining the following MeSH terms: "lower urinary tract symptoms", "benign prostatic hyperplasia", "male", "medical treatment", "surgical treatment", "deferred/postponed treatment/intervention", "early intervention/treatment". Each article title and abstract was reviewed for relevance and appropriateness with regards to the topic of this review.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The pharmacological treatment of LUTS is undoubtedly a successful story in the field of urology. Over the last two decades, the introduction of novel pharmaceutical agents has dramatically reduced the rate of BPH surgery interventions all over the world. Thus, nowadays, patients who undergo surgery are generally older, with more severe comorbidities and with larger prostates, theoretically requiring more challenging interventions. Nevertheless, the recent advances in surgical techniques and instruments have counterbalanced this unfavorable scenario and, overall, a non-pejorative trend has been observed in peri-/postoperative complications. On the other hand, evidence from the "pre-pharmacological-treatment era" suggested that immediate BPH surgery might be the best option for patients at risk of severe BPH progression. Still, no clear-cut, shared criteria have yet been established to effectively identify these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Several questions remain unanswered regarding the role of medical treatment in BPH, and good-quality studies available on this topic are surprisingly rare. The evidence presented in this review supports the need for prospective comparative studies evaluating long-term LUTS/BPH pharmacological treatment versus an early surgical intervention, particularly using the emerging laser technologies.

摘要

引言

本文旨在系统收集关于下尿路症状(LUTS)医学治疗对良性前列腺增生(BPH)手术影响的现有证据。

证据获取

通过组合以下医学主题词(MeSH),对1990年1月至2016年6月进行了系统的文献检索:“下尿路症状”、“良性前列腺增生”、“男性”、“医学治疗”、“外科治疗”、“延迟/推迟治疗/干预”、“早期干预/治疗”。对每篇文章的标题和摘要进行了审查,以确定其与本综述主题的相关性和适用性。

证据综合

LUTS的药物治疗无疑是泌尿外科领域的一个成功案例。在过去二十年中,新型药物的引入显著降低了全球BPH手术干预率。因此,如今接受手术的患者通常年龄更大,合并症更严重,前列腺更大,理论上需要更具挑战性的干预措施。然而,手术技术和器械的最新进展抵消了这种不利情况,总体而言,围手术期/术后并发症呈非恶化趋势。另一方面,“药物治疗前时代”的证据表明立即进行BPH手术可能是有严重BPH进展风险患者的最佳选择。不过,尚未建立明确、统一的标准来有效识别这些患者。

结论

关于医学治疗在BPH中的作用,仍有几个问题未得到解答,而且关于该主题的高质量研究出奇地少。本综述中呈现的证据支持需要进行前瞻性比较研究,评估长期LUTS/BPH药物治疗与早期手术干预,特别是使用新兴激光技术的情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验